Navigating the LLM Inference Landscape: Practical Insights on TGI and vLLM

Choosing the right inference engine for large language models (LLMs) is more than a technical decision—it shapes how we deliver AI-powered experiences at scale. In this post, we’ll dive into the practical realities of using Hugging Face’s Text Generation Inference (TGI) and vLLM, exploring the challenges, solutions, and creative considerations that matter most when deploying models in production.

The Big Picture: Why Inference Engines Matter

Inference engines are the unsung heroes of the AI stack. They transform trained models from static artifacts into dynamic, responsive services. The choice between TGI and vLLM isn’t just about speed or ease of use—it’s about how we balance performance, scalability, reliability, and developer experience in real-world scenarios.

TGI and vLLM: A Brief Introduction

Text Generation Inference (TGI): Developed by Hugging Face, TGI is designed for production-ready, real-time text generation. It offers seamless integration with Hugging Face models, robust monitoring, and strong support for batching and structured outputs.

vLLM: Born from research at UC Berkeley, vLLM is engineered for speed and memory efficiency. Its secret weapon, PagedAttention, and continuous batching allow it to handle high concurrency and large workloads with remarkable efficiency.

Practical Challenges: What We’ve Learned

1. Throughput vs. Latency: The Balancing Act

Challenge: High-throughput workloads can overwhelm inference engines, leading to increased latency and slower response times.

Solution: vLLM’s continuous batching and PagedAttention enable it to process multiple requests efficiently, making it ideal for high-concurrency scenarios. TGI is optimized for low-latency, real-time use cases, ensuring quick responses for individual users.

2. Memory Management: The Hidden Bottleneck

Challenge: Large models require significant GPU memory, which can limit scalability and drive up costs.

Solution: vLLM’s memory management is highly efficient, allowing for more concurrent users or larger models on the same hardware. TGI supports quantization (FP16, INT8) to reduce memory footprint, making it suitable for resource-constrained deployments.

3. Production Readiness: Monitoring and Reliability

Challenge: Production environments demand robust monitoring, logging, and observability to ensure reliability and quick incident response.

Solution: TGI offers built-in telemetry, OpenTelemetry integration, and Prometheus metrics, making it easier to monitor and troubleshoot in production. vLLM is less feature-rich in this area, so additional instrumentation may be needed.

4. Model Compatibility and Flexibility

Challenge: Not all models are supported out of the box, and deployment workflows can be complex.

Solution: TGI is tightly integrated with the Hugging Face ecosystem, making it straightforward to deploy any Hugging Face model, including private or gated ones. vLLM is highly flexible but may require more manual configuration for some use cases.

5. Handling Long Contexts and Advanced Decoding

Challenge: Long context windows and advanced decoding strategies (like beam search or top-k sampling) can impact performance and memory usage.

Solution: TGI implements speculative decoding and supports diverse decoding strategies, making it suitable for applications requiring complex output generation. vLLM excels at token-level scheduling and efficient memory management, but may not always support the latest decoding features as quickly as TGI.

TGI vs. vLLM: A Practical Comparison

Below is a detailed comparison of TGI and vLLM across key parameters and use cases:

Table: TGI vs. vLLM – Key Differences and Use Cases

Beyond the Basics: Creative Solutions and Meaningful Trade-offs

Choose Based on Use Case: For high-throughput, multi-GPU environments, vLLM is often the best choice. For real-time, production-ready APIs with strong monitoring, TGI is ideal.

1. Monitor and Instrument: Regardless of the engine, invest in monitoring and logging to ensure reliability. For vLLM, consider adding custom metrics and alerts.

2. Optimize Memory Usage: Use quantization and model pruning to reduce memory footprint, especially when deploying large models.

3. Test in Staging: Always test inference engines with realistic workloads in staging environments before going to production.

4. Plan for Scalability: Use Kubernetes or other orchestration tools to scale inference services dynamically based on demand.

The Human Side: Lessons from the Trenches

Deploying LLMs at scale is as much about people as it is about technology. We’ve learned that:

1. Collaboration is Key: Engineers, data scientists, and DevOps teams must work together to choose the right engine and optimize deployment workflows.

2. Continuous Learning: The LLM landscape is evolving rapidly. Staying up-to-date with new features, benchmarks, and best practices is essential.

3. Share Knowledge: Documenting challenges, solutions, and lessons learned helps the entire team grow and innovate.

Sovereign AI: The Power of In-House Deployment

As we push the boundaries of what’s possible with LLM inference, data sovereignty and control become increasingly important—especially for organizations handling sensitive or proprietary data. This is where sovereign AI comes into play.

What Is Sovereign AI?

Sovereign AI refers to the ability of an organization to deploy, manage, and control AI models entirely within its own infrastructure, without relying on external cloud providers or third-party services. This approach ensures that all data, model weights, and inference operations remain in-house, providing maximum security, compliance, and control.

How Does Sovereign AI Work in Practice?

1. On-Premises Infrastructure: Deploy inference servers and LLMs on internal servers or private cloud environments.

2. Controlled Access: Restrict access to authorized personnel, using enterprise-grade authentication and monitoring.

3. Data Isolation: Ensure that sensitive datasets and model outputs remain within the organization’s network, with no external connectivity unless explicitly required.

4. Continuous Monitoring and Auditing: Implement robust logging, monitoring, and auditing to detect and respond to any anomalies or security incidents.

Creative Considerations and Challenges

1. Operational Overhead: Managing in-house infrastructure requires dedicated resources and expertise, which can increase operational complexity.

2. Balancing Control and Productivity: While sovereign AI provides maximum control, it can limit the ability to leverage external innovations or cloud-native features. Organizations must balance these trade-offs based on their risk tolerance and business needs.

3. Scalability: Scaling sovereign AI deployments requires careful planning and investment in hardware and orchestration tools.

Sovereign AI and Model Inference

When deploying LLMs in-house, organizations can leverage TGI or vLLM to build robust, scalable, and secure inference services. For example, a research lab or enterprise might use an internal cluster to run vLLM or TGI, ensuring that model outputs and sensitive inputs never leave the secure environment. Data scientists and engineers can transfer model weights and datasets internally, and inference results remain under strict organizational control.

Conclusion: Innovation and Control Hand in Hand

As we continue to innovate with LLM inference engines like TGI and vLLM, sovereign AI represents a powerful approach for organizations that prioritize data security, compliance, and control. By deploying models in-house, we can deliver AI solutions that are not only fast and scalable, but also secure and trustworthy.

Let’s keep sharing insights and best practices, making our engineering blog a vibrant hub for both innovation and security.

1. https://www.inferless.com/learn/vllm-vs-tgi-the-ultimate-comparison-for-speed-scalability-and-llm-performance

2. https://modal.com/blog/vllm-vs-tgi-article

3. https://kelk.ai/blog/inference-engines

4. https://muegenai.com/docs/data-science/llmops/module-6-tools-ecosystem-for-llmops/vllm-tgi-deepspeed-inference/

5. https://tunehq.ai/blog/comparing-vllm-and-tgi

6. https://www.becloudready.com/post/inferencing-options-tgi-vllm-ollama-and-triton