TTC Protocol: Tondi Transaction Channel – A RGB-Native Off-Chain Channel for Scalable, Private, and Compliant Bitcoin Settlements


I. Project Overview
TTC (Tondi Transaction Channel), developed by Avato Labs, is an innovative off-chain protocol designed as a modern evolution of the Lightning Network (LN). Built natively for RGB ecosystems, TTC enables high-frequency, multi-asset transactions with enhanced privacy, reduced on-chain footprint, and built-in compliance features. By leveraging Tondi's high-performance DAG chain as the anchoring layer and RGBX's client-side validation, TTC addresses LN's limitations while preserving its core strengths in off-chain scalability.
TTC positions itself as a RGB-native channel protocol, facilitating instant, low-cost interactions for payments, asset swaps, and complex contracts. It supports seamless integration with BTC Taproot, RGB tokens, NFTs, and DAOs, making it ideal for Web3 applications requiring speed, privacy, and regulatory adaptability. Unlike LN's focus on simple BTC payments, TTC unlocks multi-dimensional state management, positioning it as a foundational L2.2 layer in the Tondi ecosystem.
II. Design Philosophy: Off-Chain Efficiency with RGB Purity
TTC draws from LN's bidirectional channel model but aligns deeply with RGB's principles: client-side execution, minimal on-chain commitments, and verifiable privacy. The philosophy emphasizes:
Simplicity and Security: Use Taproot-only (P2TR) structures to minimize script complexity and attack surfaces.
User Sovereignty: Eliminate the need for constant online presence through cryptographic proofs and delayed reveals.
Performance Optimization: Achieve millisecond latencies via local validations and aggregated settlements.
Compliance Balance: Incorporate selective disclosure without compromising default anonymity.
Ecosystem Synergy: Integrate with RGBX for contract support and Tondi for high-throughput anchoring, avoiding LN's silos.
This approach critiques LN's coupled state management, which burdens users with watchtowers and exposes paths to analysis, while TTC decouples validation for true decentralization.
III. Core Principles of the Lightning Network (LN)
To contextualize TTC, we first outline LN's architecture as a reference prototype:
Component | Functionality |
Bidirectional Channels | Parties create an on-chain funding transaction (Funding TX) for off-chain interactions. |
HTLC Contracts | Hash Time-Locked Contracts enable routed payments across nodes. |
State Updates | Parties negotiate new commitments, revoking old states via punishment mechanisms. |
Channel Closure | Any party can close by submitting the latest state; cooperative or unilateral. |
Privacy Mechanisms | Onion routing hides paths, but HTLCs are traceable on-chain. |
Fault Tolerance | Requires online monitoring or watchtowers to prevent fraudulent old-state submissions. |
LN excels in reducing on-chain load for micropayments but introduces complexities in management and compatibility.
IV. Limitations of the Lightning Network
Despite its innovations, LN has notable drawbacks that TTC aims to overcome:
Issue | Description |
Require Constant Online Presence | Users must monitor for malicious old-state submissions, necessitating watchtowers. |
Limited Scalability | Relies on sufficient liquidity per hop; complex paths lead to failures. |
State Management Complexity | Multi-hop payments involve synchronized signatures and locks. |
High Script Complexity | P2WSH with timelocks/multisigs; incompatible with Taproot-only efficiency. |
Non-Native Contract Support | Limited to simple payments; struggles with NFTs, DAOs, or non-BTC assets. |
Uncontrolled Auditing | No selective disclosure; lacks compliance tools. |
Poor Encapsulation | Does not support RGB tokens or structured assets; exposes HTLC structures. |
These flaws highlight LN's BTC-centric design, which TTC transcends for a RGB-native future.
V. TTC Design Goals and Core Improvements
TTC inherits LN's off-chain efficiency but introduces breakthroughs for RGB compatibility:
Category | Lightning Network | TTC (Tondi Transaction Channel) |
Anchoring Structure | BTC P2WSH | Tondi P2TR-only (with aggregated signatures) |
Contract Support | None | Full RGB token and contract state integration |
State Representation | Single-dimensional balance updates | Multi-dimensional asset commitments |
State Protection | Watchtower-dependent | Built-in zero-knowledge proof-of-state; irreversible updates |
Offline Tolerance | Weak; requires constant online | Strong; client-stored signed proofs with delayed reveal |
Multi-Hop Payments | HTLC forwarding (high coupling) | Optional route forwarding + client relay; no on-chain interaction |
Exit Modes | Unilateral/cooperative closure | Aggregated state encapsulation as RGB seal; unified settlement |
Privacy | Analyzable via HTLC graphs | Fully hidden (hash commitments only) |
Compliance Adaptation | None | Selective viewing keys and audit paths |
Inherited Elements from LN
TTC builds on LN's proven mechanics:
Inherited Aspect | TTC Implementation |
Resource Savings via Channels | Submit to Tondi only for aggregated anchors. |
Multi-Round Signatures for Updates | Dual signatures confirm RGB token transfers. |
Routed Payments | Integrate RGB Relay or Hop contracts for path routing. |
Offline-Focused Processing | State updates without real-time broadcasts; mobile-friendly. |
Key Improvements Over LN
TTC directly addresses LN's weaknesses:
LN Limitation | TTC Solution |
Poor HTLC Privacy and Complexity | P2TR key paths only; states as hash commitments for indistinguishability. |
Mandatory Online Presence | Updates generate verifiable one-way seals + Merkle hashes; parties prove valid states offline. |
No Non-BTC Asset Support | Native handling of RGB tokens, NFTs, voting proofs, and cross-chain receipts. |
Lack of Contracts | Embed voting credentials, timelocked delegations, and mixing tickets (e.g., CrossShade). |
Auditing Challenges | ZK-view paths for selective transparency; authorized regulatory audits. |
VI. Technical Architecture
TTC's architecture fuses LN's channel model with RGBX's client-side features:
Channel Establishment: Parties create a P2TR funding output on Tondi, committing initial RGB states via hash seals.
State Updates: Off-chain negotiations produce signed commitments; each update generates a Merkle-proofed seal, ensuring non-revocable progression without watchtowers.
Multi-Asset Handling: States support vectors of RGB assets (e.g., tokens + NFTs); validations use AluVM locally.
Routing and Relays: Client-side relays for multi-hop; optional ZK proofs mask paths.
Closure and Settlement: Aggregate updates into a single RGB seal; submit to Tondi for final anchoring. Schnorr batching optimizes fees.
Privacy and Compliance: All interactions as commitments; viewing keys enable selective reveals for audits.
Performance Metrics: Millisecond latencies for updates; <1s settlements on Tondi; 95% on-chain reduction via aggregation.
VII. Positioning in the Ecosystem (Integration with RGBX and Tondi)
TTC fits as a layered extension:
Layer | Protocol | Functionality |
L1 | Tondi Mainnet | High-throughput P2TR block space for anchors. |
L2.1 | RGBX + Seals | Verifiable contract state submissions and cross-chain transfers. |
L2.2 | TTC | Off-chain, instant multi-asset state submissions and payments. |
L2.3 (Future) | zkTicket Bridge | Integrate TTC outputs into CrossShade/Lightning for anonymous gateways. |
This stack enables end-to-end RGB flows: off-chain via TTC, anchored on Tondi.
VIII. Core Application Scenarios
Avato Chat RGB Red Envelope System:
Establish temporary RGB token channels for instant red envelopes.
Recipients claim offline; aggregate 100+ transactions into one RGB seal for Tondi submission.
NFT Channel Swaps:
Peer-to-peer NFT ownership transfers via TTC.
Dual-signed seals create unified commitments; anchor once, saving 95% on-chain space.
DAO Off-Chain Voting:
Aggregate votes as seals in channels.
Anchor result hashes; optional RGB audits or ZK disclosures for transparency.
IX. Conclusion: TTC as a Superior, RGB-Native Alternative to LN
TTC redefines off-chain channels for the RGB era, blending LN's efficiency with modern enhancements:
Core Attribute | TTC Characteristics |
Structural Simplicity | Full Taproot single-key; no multisig scripts. |
Contract Compatibility | RGB-native; client-side seals for complex states. |
Privacy | Path-hidden; no HTLC exposure; anonymous swaps. |
Performance | Millisecond latencies; local execution + aggregated uploads. |
Compliance | Viewing keys and ZK proof-of-state for selective audits. |
User Experience | No constant online requirement; relay-free caching. |
TTC empowers a scalable, private Bitcoin future. We invite collaborators to advance this protocol toward widespread adoption.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Yosei Tsukifune directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Yosei Tsukifune
Yosei Tsukifune
月舟 曜誠(つきふね ようせい)と申します。 人体工学エンジニア、クオンツ金融エンジンアーキテクト、暗号技術の専門家として、 現在は Tondiチェーンの主任研究員を務めております。 RGBプロトコル、DAG構造、クライアント検証型スマートコントラクトなど、 次世代の分散型金融インフラの設計と実装に取り組んでいます。 私は、技術とは単なる道具ではなく、文明秩序を記述するコードだと考えています。 本日、このような機会をいただき、大変光栄です。