TTC Protocol: Tondi Transaction Channel – A RGB-Native Off-Chain Channel for Scalable, Private, and Compliant Bitcoin Settlements

Yosei TsukifuneYosei Tsukifune
6 min read

I. Project Overview

TTC (Tondi Transaction Channel), developed by Avato Labs, is an innovative off-chain protocol designed as a modern evolution of the Lightning Network (LN). Built natively for RGB ecosystems, TTC enables high-frequency, multi-asset transactions with enhanced privacy, reduced on-chain footprint, and built-in compliance features. By leveraging Tondi's high-performance DAG chain as the anchoring layer and RGBX's client-side validation, TTC addresses LN's limitations while preserving its core strengths in off-chain scalability.

TTC positions itself as a RGB-native channel protocol, facilitating instant, low-cost interactions for payments, asset swaps, and complex contracts. It supports seamless integration with BTC Taproot, RGB tokens, NFTs, and DAOs, making it ideal for Web3 applications requiring speed, privacy, and regulatory adaptability. Unlike LN's focus on simple BTC payments, TTC unlocks multi-dimensional state management, positioning it as a foundational L2.2 layer in the Tondi ecosystem.

II. Design Philosophy: Off-Chain Efficiency with RGB Purity

TTC draws from LN's bidirectional channel model but aligns deeply with RGB's principles: client-side execution, minimal on-chain commitments, and verifiable privacy. The philosophy emphasizes:

  • Simplicity and Security: Use Taproot-only (P2TR) structures to minimize script complexity and attack surfaces.

  • User Sovereignty: Eliminate the need for constant online presence through cryptographic proofs and delayed reveals.

  • Performance Optimization: Achieve millisecond latencies via local validations and aggregated settlements.

  • Compliance Balance: Incorporate selective disclosure without compromising default anonymity.

  • Ecosystem Synergy: Integrate with RGBX for contract support and Tondi for high-throughput anchoring, avoiding LN's silos.

This approach critiques LN's coupled state management, which burdens users with watchtowers and exposes paths to analysis, while TTC decouples validation for true decentralization.

III. Core Principles of the Lightning Network (LN)

To contextualize TTC, we first outline LN's architecture as a reference prototype:

ComponentFunctionality
Bidirectional ChannelsParties create an on-chain funding transaction (Funding TX) for off-chain interactions.
HTLC ContractsHash Time-Locked Contracts enable routed payments across nodes.
State UpdatesParties negotiate new commitments, revoking old states via punishment mechanisms.
Channel ClosureAny party can close by submitting the latest state; cooperative or unilateral.
Privacy MechanismsOnion routing hides paths, but HTLCs are traceable on-chain.
Fault ToleranceRequires online monitoring or watchtowers to prevent fraudulent old-state submissions.

LN excels in reducing on-chain load for micropayments but introduces complexities in management and compatibility.

IV. Limitations of the Lightning Network

Despite its innovations, LN has notable drawbacks that TTC aims to overcome:

IssueDescription
Require Constant Online PresenceUsers must monitor for malicious old-state submissions, necessitating watchtowers.
Limited ScalabilityRelies on sufficient liquidity per hop; complex paths lead to failures.
State Management ComplexityMulti-hop payments involve synchronized signatures and locks.
High Script ComplexityP2WSH with timelocks/multisigs; incompatible with Taproot-only efficiency.
Non-Native Contract SupportLimited to simple payments; struggles with NFTs, DAOs, or non-BTC assets.
Uncontrolled AuditingNo selective disclosure; lacks compliance tools.
Poor EncapsulationDoes not support RGB tokens or structured assets; exposes HTLC structures.

These flaws highlight LN's BTC-centric design, which TTC transcends for a RGB-native future.

V. TTC Design Goals and Core Improvements

TTC inherits LN's off-chain efficiency but introduces breakthroughs for RGB compatibility:

CategoryLightning NetworkTTC (Tondi Transaction Channel)
Anchoring StructureBTC P2WSHTondi P2TR-only (with aggregated signatures)
Contract SupportNoneFull RGB token and contract state integration
State RepresentationSingle-dimensional balance updatesMulti-dimensional asset commitments
State ProtectionWatchtower-dependentBuilt-in zero-knowledge proof-of-state; irreversible updates
Offline ToleranceWeak; requires constant onlineStrong; client-stored signed proofs with delayed reveal
Multi-Hop PaymentsHTLC forwarding (high coupling)Optional route forwarding + client relay; no on-chain interaction
Exit ModesUnilateral/cooperative closureAggregated state encapsulation as RGB seal; unified settlement
PrivacyAnalyzable via HTLC graphsFully hidden (hash commitments only)
Compliance AdaptationNoneSelective viewing keys and audit paths

Inherited Elements from LN

TTC builds on LN's proven mechanics:

Inherited AspectTTC Implementation
Resource Savings via ChannelsSubmit to Tondi only for aggregated anchors.
Multi-Round Signatures for UpdatesDual signatures confirm RGB token transfers.
Routed PaymentsIntegrate RGB Relay or Hop contracts for path routing.
Offline-Focused ProcessingState updates without real-time broadcasts; mobile-friendly.

Key Improvements Over LN

TTC directly addresses LN's weaknesses:

LN LimitationTTC Solution
Poor HTLC Privacy and ComplexityP2TR key paths only; states as hash commitments for indistinguishability.
Mandatory Online PresenceUpdates generate verifiable one-way seals + Merkle hashes; parties prove valid states offline.
No Non-BTC Asset SupportNative handling of RGB tokens, NFTs, voting proofs, and cross-chain receipts.
Lack of ContractsEmbed voting credentials, timelocked delegations, and mixing tickets (e.g., CrossShade).
Auditing ChallengesZK-view paths for selective transparency; authorized regulatory audits.

VI. Technical Architecture

TTC's architecture fuses LN's channel model with RGBX's client-side features:

  • Channel Establishment: Parties create a P2TR funding output on Tondi, committing initial RGB states via hash seals.

  • State Updates: Off-chain negotiations produce signed commitments; each update generates a Merkle-proofed seal, ensuring non-revocable progression without watchtowers.

  • Multi-Asset Handling: States support vectors of RGB assets (e.g., tokens + NFTs); validations use AluVM locally.

  • Routing and Relays: Client-side relays for multi-hop; optional ZK proofs mask paths.

  • Closure and Settlement: Aggregate updates into a single RGB seal; submit to Tondi for final anchoring. Schnorr batching optimizes fees.

  • Privacy and Compliance: All interactions as commitments; viewing keys enable selective reveals for audits.

Performance Metrics: Millisecond latencies for updates; <1s settlements on Tondi; 95% on-chain reduction via aggregation.

VII. Positioning in the Ecosystem (Integration with RGBX and Tondi)

TTC fits as a layered extension:

LayerProtocolFunctionality
L1Tondi MainnetHigh-throughput P2TR block space for anchors.
L2.1RGBX + SealsVerifiable contract state submissions and cross-chain transfers.
L2.2TTCOff-chain, instant multi-asset state submissions and payments.
L2.3 (Future)zkTicket BridgeIntegrate TTC outputs into CrossShade/Lightning for anonymous gateways.

This stack enables end-to-end RGB flows: off-chain via TTC, anchored on Tondi.

VIII. Core Application Scenarios

  1. Avato Chat RGB Red Envelope System:

    • Establish temporary RGB token channels for instant red envelopes.

    • Recipients claim offline; aggregate 100+ transactions into one RGB seal for Tondi submission.

  2. NFT Channel Swaps:

    • Peer-to-peer NFT ownership transfers via TTC.

    • Dual-signed seals create unified commitments; anchor once, saving 95% on-chain space.

  3. DAO Off-Chain Voting:

    • Aggregate votes as seals in channels.

    • Anchor result hashes; optional RGB audits or ZK disclosures for transparency.

IX. Conclusion: TTC as a Superior, RGB-Native Alternative to LN

TTC redefines off-chain channels for the RGB era, blending LN's efficiency with modern enhancements:

Core AttributeTTC Characteristics
Structural SimplicityFull Taproot single-key; no multisig scripts.
Contract CompatibilityRGB-native; client-side seals for complex states.
PrivacyPath-hidden; no HTLC exposure; anonymous swaps.
PerformanceMillisecond latencies; local execution + aggregated uploads.
ComplianceViewing keys and ZK proof-of-state for selective audits.
User ExperienceNo constant online requirement; relay-free caching.

TTC empowers a scalable, private Bitcoin future. We invite collaborators to advance this protocol toward widespread adoption.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Yosei Tsukifune directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Yosei Tsukifune
Yosei Tsukifune

月舟 曜誠(つきふね ようせい)と申します。 人体工学エンジニア、クオンツ金融エンジンアーキテクト、暗号技術の専門家として、 現在は Tondiチェーンの主任研究員を務めております。 RGBプロトコル、DAG構造、クライアント検証型スマートコントラクトなど、 次世代の分散型金融インフラの設計と実装に取り組んでいます。 私は、技術とは単なる道具ではなく、文明秩序を記述するコードだと考えています。 本日、このような機会をいただき、大変光栄です。