The right to retrospective correction

Dice AlgorithmsDice Algorithms
2 min read

Excerpt from the Correctional Code / Clearance Level: 1A | Public Awareness: Suppressed

In the year 2143, after the narrative collapse caused by the so-called Resonance Syndrome, the government introduced the Public Self-Correction Program. It was acknowledged that individual errors — including both actions and intentions — accumulate in the informational space and exert a destabilizing influence on the shared environment.

According to the regulations of Section 5, every citizen has the right to retrospective correction — a one-time reversal of a committed error, provided that its correction demonstrably improves systemic balance.

The conditions are as follows:

  1. The error must be reported within 72 hours of its occurrence.

  2. The intention behind the error must be disclosed — in full neurocognitive log form (EEG, emotional signature).

  3. The environmental impact of the error (emotional, social, energetic) will be assessed by the Resonance Council.

  4. If the correction is approved — the subject must agree to undergo behavioural identity reformatting.

Because here lies the paradox:
If you want to undo a mistake, you must stop being yourself.

The system does not permit a return to the version of you that made the mistake. Therefore, individuals undergoing retrospective correction lose access to earlier identity layers — memories, emotional structures, relationship networks.

It’s the equivalent of soul replacement with body continuity.

Internally, Section 5 documents refer to this process as “sanitary reincarnation.”

Of course — no one is obligated to use this right.

But an unreported error with a resonance level above 0.72 is automatically registered as intentional omission of correction. This constitutes a systemic environmental offense.

Which leads to a question no one dares to ask aloud:

Do we still have the right to be wrong?

And a second — much quieter:

Is someone who never errs still human?

“Every mistake is noise in the system. But the attempt to erase it leaves an echo that lasts even longer.”
— internal commentary, Section 5 (redacted source)

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Dice Algorithms directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Dice Algorithms
Dice Algorithms

Former military mind turned quality systems strategist. Now mapping invisible architectures — from frayed information flows to underground narratives, where truth is often a deprecated protocol. I explore the boundaries between compliance and freedom, order and chaos, technology and myth. Between an audit trail and a prayer. Some write to explain. I write to unearth — artifacts, inconsistencies, and thoughts too alive to certify. My work oscillates between control and collapse, between the dashboard and the silent alarm no one hears. I write dystopias dressed as manuals. Sometimes ironic, sometimes sarcastic, sometimes frighteningly accurate. Because in the end, even fear needs a structure.