Day 75 of DevOps Challenge: Exploring AWS Aurora


On Day 74, I explored the role of Database Management Systems (DBMS) in the DevOps lifecycle and took a deep dive into Amazon RDS (Relational Database Service). I learned how DBMSs ensure data consistency, security, and availability, critical for application reliability and scalable infrastructure.
RDS helped me understand managed relational databases in the cloud, from automated backups to encryption, multi-AZ deployments, and performance monitoring using CloudWatch and Performance Insights.
As I continue my journey into cloud-native databases, today’s goal is to master Amazon Aurora, an advanced, purpose-built relational database engine offered by AWS that combines the reliability of commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open-source engines like MySQL and PostgreSQL.
What is Amazon Aurora?
Amazon Aurora is a fully managed relational database engine that is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL, but delivers up to 5x the performance of standard MySQL and 3x for PostgreSQL, all while being highly available, scalable, and fault-tolerant.
It is a part of the RDS ecosystem but goes a step further in terms of performance, architecture, and advanced capabilities.
How Aurora Works – Architecture Breakdown
Decoupled Compute and Storage:
Compute nodes (where your DB engine runs) are separate from the storage layer.
The storage layer is a distributed, self-healing system spread across 3 Availability Zones, replicating data six times for durability.
Aurora Storage:
Automatically scales from 10 GB to 128 TB.
No manual volume resizing or provisioning.
Data is written once and replicated instantly across 6 storage nodes (2 per AZ).
Failover & Recovery:
Automated failover to replicas or secondary nodes occurs within 30 seconds or less.
Storage is continuously monitored for errors and auto-heals.
Aurora Key Features
High Performance
Aurora MySQL delivers 5x throughput over MySQL on RDS.
Aurora PostgreSQL delivers 3x throughput over PostgreSQL on RDS.
Uses high-performance SSD-based storage optimized for low-latency access.
Compatibility
Aurora MySQL: Compatible with MySQL 5.6, 5.7, 8.0
Aurora PostgreSQL: Compatible with PostgreSQL 11 to 15
Aurora Global Database
Designed for globally distributed applications.
Supports cross-region read replicas with <1-second replication lag.
Aurora Replicas
Up to 15 Aurora Replicas per cluster.
Shared underlying storage ensures ultra-fast replication.
Can promote replicas to primary DB in failover scenarios.
Aurora Serverless v2
Auto-scales compute capacity based on demand without downtime.
Ideal for intermittent or unpredictable workloads.
Provides fine-grained (0.5 ACU increments) scaling.
Aurora Security Features
Encryption at Rest: Uses AWS KMS, applies to DB, logs, and snapshots.
Encryption in Transit: Secured via SSL/TLS.
IAM Authentication: Roles can authenticate without passwords.
VPC Isolation: Enforces security boundaries.
Audit Logging: Enables tracking of DB activity for compliance.
Monitoring Aurora Performance
CloudWatch: For basic metrics like CPU, IOPS, storage, network.
Enhanced Monitoring: Real-time OS-level metrics.
Performance Insights: Pinpoint slow queries, visualize DB performance trends.
Query Plan Cache: Aurora tracks query execution plans to optimize performance.
Aurora Backup, Restore, and Maintenance
Continuous Backups: Automatically backs up to S3 with point-in-time recovery.
Manual Snapshots: Can be shared across accounts or copied across regions.
Fast Cloning: Clone large datasets in minutes without duplicating data physically.
Zero Downtime Patching: Uses “blue/green deployments” for upgrades.
Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora – What’s the Difference?
Feature | Amazon RDS | Amazon Aurora |
Engines | MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, MariaDB, Aurora | Aurora (MySQL & PostgreSQL compatible only) |
Performance | Standard (depends on engine & instance type) | 3x–5x better than standard engines |
Availability | Multi-AZ & Read Replicas | 6-way storage replication, 15 replicas |
Failover Time | ~60–120 seconds | ~30 seconds |
Storage Scaling | Manual (except some engines) | Auto-scales up to 128 TB |
Global Database Support | Limited (manual replication) | Native Aurora Global DB |
Serverless Option | No (except Aurora) | Aurora Serverless v2 |
Best Use Case | Traditional apps, existing DB engines | High-performance, scalable apps |
Cost | Lower for small workloads | Efficient at scale, but higher base cost |
When to Use RDS vs Aurora?
Scenario | Use RDS | Use Aurora |
Need support for Oracle or SQL Server | Yes | No |
Cost-sensitive, small-scale workloads | Yes | No |
Cloud-native, high-performance apps | No | Yes |
Global low-latency read access | No | Yes (Aurora Global DB) |
Unpredictable workloads | No | Yes (Aurora Serverless) |
Legacy app migration with specific DB engine | Yes | No |
High throughput & mission-critical DBs | No | Yes |
Aurora Use Cases
E-commerce: Handle massive traffic spikes during sales.
SaaS Platforms: Multi-tenant architecture with low-latency data access.
Gaming: Ultra-low-latency and high-performance backends.
Analytics Apps: Parallel read replicas for analytics queries without impacting OLTP.
Global Applications: With Aurora Global Database for cross-region reads.
Final Thoughts
Today’s exploration into Amazon Aurora opened my eyes to how AWS is reimagining the relational database engine for the cloud. Aurora is designed for high availability, fault tolerance, and performance at scale, essential attributes for modern DevOps and production workloads.
While Amazon RDS is great for simpler or legacy use cases with varied engine support, Aurora is the go-to for next-gen applications, especially those requiring global reach, read scalability, and automatic resource management.
That’s all for Day 75! Let’s keep building!
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Vaishnavi D directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
