The Hidden Cost of Manual Ops (And How to Automate the Right Way)


Manual Doesn’t Mean Cheap
In fast-moving fintech ops, it’s tempting to lean on manual workflows, especially when a fix “just takes 5 minutes.” But here’s the catch: when 10,000 customers show up, your 5-minute fix becomes a bottleneck. Or worse, a business risk.
I’ve seen this firsthand while managing fiat operations in a high-volume environment. Manual processes aren’t just expensive in time, they carry operational risk, team burnout, and reputational damage. Here's how I learned to spot the hidden costs… and how we built systems to eliminate them.
When Manual Starts to Hurt
Let me take you back to a challenge we faced with underpayments and overpayments on fiat deposits.
Customers often sent amounts that didn’t match the required value. The fix? A manual reconciliation and crediting flow that took 3–5 minutes per ticket. Sounds small, until you’re handling 400+ of these a day.
What happened:
Resolution times ballooned (3+ hours avg)
Only 1–2 team members could handle the logic (key person risk)
Errors increased → customers complained → support flooded
What it cost:
Operational drag
High escalation volume
A reactive, stressful team environment
Why Manual Ops Stick Around
Manual systems persist because:
They're fast to implement
They’re “just temporary”
No one owns the system end-to-end
But every temporary workflow that works becomes permanent and invisible until it breaks at scale.
When to Automate: A Simple Framework
Here’s the framework I use to decide what to automate:
1. Volume: Is it happening 5x a day? Or 500x?
2. Risk: What’s the cost of delay, error, or inconsistency?
3. Ownership: Can it be owned without relying on one expert?
4. Time-to-impact: Will a small automation save hours per day?
If a process hits 2+ of those triggers, it's a candidate for automation.
What We Did
We turned the under/overpayment manual flow into a fully automated system:
✅ Automatically detects mismatched payments
✅ Credits the exact received amount, updates the ledger
✅ Logs the resolution
✅ Notifies the customer
Impact:
Resolution time dropped from 3 hours to under 5 minutes
Manual support tickets vanished
Team freed up to focus on edge cases and higher-leverage work
Lessons from the Automation Journey
Start with the user pain not just the ops pain
Define the edge cases clearly. What should never be automated?
Always include audit logs and overrides. Human-in-the-loop matters
Don’t automate noise. Clean the process first, then automate it
Always have manual overrides that don’t require engineering work to activate, especially if it involves money.
Automation is Product Work
Automating ops isn’t just about efficiency. It’s product design, risk management, and user experience all rolled into one. When you treat your internal workflows like products, you build systems that don’t just work, they scale.
And that’s how you buy back time, reduce risk, and focus your team on what actually moves the business forward.
📬 Enjoyed this post? Let’s connect on Linkedin or follow Pelumi’s Ledger for real-world fintech operations strategy, product thinking, and data-driven execution.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Pelumi Okunola directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
