Project Charter: ICT Governance Framework


Document Control Information
Document Information | |
Document Title | Project Charter |
Project Name | ICT Governance Framework |
Document Version | 1.0 |
Document Status | Draft |
Created Date | August 7, 2025 |
Last Updated | August 7, 2025 |
Document Owner | CBA Consult |
Prepared By | ADPA Enterprise Framework |
Executive Summary
The ICT Governance Framework Project aims to establish a comprehensive and unified governance structure for information and communication technology resources across the organization. This framework will enable better alignment between IT initiatives and business objectives, enhance security posture, improve regulatory compliance, and optimize IT resource utilization. By implementing standardized governance processes, the organization will gain better visibility, control, and decision-making capabilities over its IT investments and operations.
Project Purpose
The purpose of the ICT Governance Framework project is to create a structured approach to governing IT resources that ensures technology investments support strategic business objectives while managing risks effectively. The framework will provide a clear set of policies, procedures, roles, and responsibilities for IT decision-making and oversight, establishing accountability and transparency in IT management.
Business Case
Business Need
The organization currently faces several challenges related to IT governance:
Fragmented decision-making processes for IT investments
Inconsistent application of security and compliance requirements
Limited visibility into IT resource utilization and effectiveness
Difficulty in prioritizing IT initiatives aligned with business strategy
Compliance gaps with industry regulations and standards
Inefficient management of cloud resources and security controls
Expected Benefits
The implementation of the ICT Governance Framework is expected to deliver the following benefits:
Benefit Category | Description | Measurable Outcome |
Strategic Alignment | Better alignment between IT initiatives and business objectives | 25% increase in IT projects directly supporting strategic business goals |
Risk Management | Enhanced management of technology risks | 30% reduction in security incidents and compliance violations |
Resource Optimization | Improved allocation and utilization of IT resources | 15% reduction in IT operational costs |
Performance Improvement | More effective IT service delivery | 20% improvement in IT service quality metrics |
Compliance | Strengthened regulatory compliance | 100% compliance with relevant standards and regulations |
Decision-making | More informed and structured IT decision processes | 40% reduction in time to make IT investment decisions |
Financial Summary
Cost Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total |
Implementation | $250,000 | $100,000 | $50,000 | $400,000 |
Ongoing Operations | $75,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 | $325,000 |
Total Costs | $325,000 | $225,000 | $175,000 | $725,000 |
Expected Benefits | $200,000 | $450,000 | $600,000 | $1,250,000 |
Net Benefit | ($125,000) | $225,000 | $425,000 | $525,000 |
ROI (3-year) | 72% | |||
Payback Period | 18 months |
Project Objectives
# | Objective | Success Criteria | Priority |
1 | Establish a comprehensive IT governance structure with clear roles and responsibilities | Approved RACI matrix for all IT governance functions | High |
2 | Develop and implement IT governance policies and procedures | 100% of required policies documented and approved | High |
3 | Implement security and compliance monitoring mechanisms | Automated compliance dashboard with 95% accuracy | High |
4 | Create standardized IT decision-making frameworks | IT decision frameworks documented and in use by all departments | Medium |
5 | Establish metrics and reporting mechanisms for IT governance | Monthly governance reports delivered to executive team | Medium |
6 | Integrate the governance framework with existing management systems | Integration points documented and implemented | Medium |
7 | Train stakeholders on governance procedures and tools | 90% of stakeholders trained and certified | Medium |
8 | Deploy automated tools for governance monitoring and reporting | Governance dashboard implemented and operational | Low |
Project Scope
In Scope
Development of IT governance policies, procedures, and standards
Definition of IT governance organizational structure and roles
Implementation of IT governance decision-making frameworks
Creation of IT risk management processes within the governance structure
Development of IT performance measurement and reporting mechanisms
Integration with existing IT service management processes
Training and change management for the new governance framework
Implementation of supporting tools and technologies for governance
Integration with cloud security and compliance controls
Out of Scope
Actual execution of IT projects (the framework governs the process but doesn't execute projects)
Detailed technical implementation of security controls (governed but not implemented by this project)
Changes to core business processes outside of IT governance
Development of business strategy (the framework aligns with strategy but doesn't create it)
Implementation of IT infrastructure changes
Replacement of existing project management methodologies
Project Deliverables
Deliverable | Description | Acceptance Criteria |
Governance Framework Documentation | Comprehensive documentation of the governance framework | Approved by IT steering committee and legal/compliance teams |
IT Policy Documentation | Set of policies covering all aspects of IT governance | Policies meet regulatory requirements and industry standards |
RACI Matrix | Matrix defining roles and responsibilities for governance activities | Approved by executive stakeholders and department heads |
Decision-Making Frameworks | Structured approaches for different types of IT decisions | Successfully used in at least 3 test decision scenarios |
IT Governance Organization Structure | Defined committees, roles and reporting relationships | Approved by executive management |
Governance Metrics Dashboard | Reporting system for governance metrics | Accurate reporting of key governance metrics |
Implementation Roadmap | Phased approach for implementing the governance framework | Clear milestones with measurable success criteria |
Training Materials | Materials for training stakeholders on the framework | Comprehensive coverage of all governance aspects |
Governance Tools Implementation | Configured tools to support governance processes | Tools implemented and operational |
Project Timeline
Phase | Start Date | End Date | Key Milestones |
Initiation | 2025-08-15 | 2025-09-15 | Project charter approval, Stakeholder register complete |
Assessment & Analysis | 2025-09-16 | 2025-10-31 | Current state assessment complete, Gap analysis finished |
Design | 2025-11-01 | 2026-01-15 | Framework design approved, Policies drafted |
Implementation (Phase 1) | 2026-01-16 | 2026-03-31 | Core governance structure implemented, Initial policies deployed |
Implementation (Phase 2) | 2026-04-01 | 2026-06-30 | Reporting mechanisms implemented, Tools deployed |
Training & Transition | 2026-07-01 | 2026-08-31 | Training completed, Framework operational |
Closeout | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-30 | Project review complete, Transition to operations |
High-Level Risks
Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Risk Score | Mitigation Strategy |
R1 | Resistance to governance processes from stakeholders | High | High | High | Strong change management and executive sponsorship |
R2 | Insufficient resources allocated to implementation | Medium | High | High | Secure resource commitments upfront with contingency |
R3 | Governance framework too complex for adoption | Medium | High | High | Focus on simplicity and incremental implementation |
R4 | Competing organizational initiatives impacting timeline | Medium | Medium | Medium | Coordinate with PMO and secure executive prioritization |
R5 | Changing regulatory requirements during implementation | Low | High | Medium | Regular compliance reviews and adaptive framework design |
R6 | Inadequate tool support for governance processes | Medium | Medium | Medium | Early evaluation and pilot testing of tools |
R7 | Loss of key project personnel | Low | Medium | Low | Knowledge sharing and documentation throughout project |
Project Organization
Project Governance Structure
Role | Responsibility | Name/Position |
Executive Sponsor | Ultimate authority, resolves escalated issues | CIO |
Project Steering Committee | Strategic direction, major decisions | CIO, CFO, CISO, Business Unit Heads |
Project Manager | Day-to-day management, reporting | TBD |
Technical Lead | Technical guidance and oversight | IT Architecture Director |
Change Manager | Manage organizational change aspects | Organizational Change Director |
Quality Assurance | Ensure deliverable quality | Quality Manager |
RACI Matrix
Activity | Executive Sponsor | Steering Committee | Project Manager | Technical Lead | Change Manager | Business Stakeholders |
Charter Approval | A | C | R | C | I | I |
Requirements Definition | I | C | A | R | C | R |
Framework Design | I | A | R | R | C | C |
Policy Development | I | A | R | C | C | C |
Implementation Planning | I | A | R | R | C | C |
Tool Selection | I | A | R | R | I | C |
Change Management | I | A | C | I | R | C |
Training | I | I | A | C | R | C |
Progress Reporting | I | A | R | C | C | I |
Final Acceptance | A | R | R | C | C | C |
R = Responsible, A = Accountable, C = Consulted, I = Informed
Approval
Name | Role | Signature | Date |
[Name] | Executive Sponsor | ______________ | __________ |
[Name] | Business Sponsor | ______________ | __________ |
[Name] | Project Manager | ______________ | __________ |
[Name] | IT Governance Lead | ______________ | __________ |
Generated by ADPA Enterprise Framework Automation on August 7, 2025
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Menno Drescher directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Menno Drescher
Menno Drescher
Our extensive experience in Human Capital Management (HCM), combined with a strong background in Finance, ICT employee HR system adoption, and HR consultancy, brings a compelling value proposition. Our expertise in transformations to Entra, Organizational Performance Management, Analytical Skills, Security and Compliance, and End User Adoption is crucial in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape.