You Can Read Anyone in Tech — Even Zuckerberg


Introduction: The Communication Bug in Tech
Tech loves to pretend it’s above all that.
Above emotion. Above ambiguity. Above the mess of being human.
We praise clarity, logic, brevity. We optimise meetings, sanitise conversations, and pretend the loudest voice in the room knows what they’re doing. But underneath the metrics and models, most teams are quietly derailed by something we’re all terrible at: reading each other.
Not reading resumes. Reading people.
We misinterpret silence as confidence. We take quick comebacks as competence. We assume charisma equals credibility. And when things go sideways—when projects stall, co-founders implode, or teams quietly erode trust—we chalk it up to “communication issues” as if that’s a footnote, not the story.
So let’s talk about the masks we wear.
Let’s talk about what we’re really signalling—and what we’re too distracted or data-blind to see.
This post is a breakdown of communication in tech through two lenses:
You Can Read Anyone, a book that feels part psychological toolkit, part behavioural spy manual. It teaches how to spot emotional “tells,” masks, and misalignments in real time.
The Social Network, the cinematic fever dream of startup culture, ego, betrayal—and some of the best examples of nonverbal miscommunication ever put to screen.
Because whether you’re a product manager, an engineer, or the guy building the next Facebook knockoff in your dorm room—you’re navigating power, emotion, and social ambiguity every day. Most of us are just flying blind.
Let’s fix that.
1. Communication in Tech Is Full of Emotional Masks
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: for an industry obsessed with transparency, tech is full of people pretending.
Not pretending to be someone else. Pretending to be fine. Pretending to be confident. Pretending not to care.
These are what You Can Read Anyone calls emotional masks—protective behaviours we wear to avoid vulnerability. They show up in tone, pace, posture, and especially in who interrupts who in a meeting. They’re not lies. They’re shields.
And in tech? We reward them.
The emotionally detached engineer who “just wants to code” gets labelled focused.
The overcompensating founder with a cult of personality gets hailed as visionary.
The loyal operator who stays late and never pushes back? We call them dependable—but ignore the anxiety underneath.
You’ve seen these people. Hell, you’ve probably been these people. I have.
And nowhere are these masks more visible—or more instructive—than in The Social Network.
Let’s decode the emotional tells behind the story of Facebook, one mask at a time.
2. Mark Zuckerberg — The Detachment Mask
Perfectionism, emotional shutdown, and the myth of logic as leadership
Let’s start with the myth: Mark is brilliant, therefore Mark is cold. Or maybe it’s the other way around. Either way, we’re supposed to believe that Zuckerberg’s emotional detachment is a feature of his intelligence—not a bug in his ability to connect.
But what You Can Read Anyone teaches us is that emotional masks aren’t random—they’re reactive.
Zuckerberg’s detachment isn’t strength. It’s armour.
Watch the opening scene of The Social Network—the bar with Erica. She’s warm, direct, open. Mark’s rapid-fire responses feel smart on the surface, but underneath? They’re textbook emotional deflection. He can’t sit in discomfort. He can’t tolerate ambiguity. He has to win. Even if it means torching the conversation to do it.
“You’re not an asshole, Mark. You’re just trying so hard to be.”
—Erica, doing what most tech leaders need: emotionally mirroring someone who won’t do it themselves.
Throughout the film, Mark’s behaviour follows a pattern familiar to anyone who’s worked with a highly technical, emotionally stunted founder or senior engineer:
Monotone delivery → suppressing emotional vulnerability
Sharp, logical comebacks → controlling the narrative through precision
Avoiding eye contact → managing internal tension by disengaging
In engineering culture, this gets misread as focus. As clarity.
But what it really is… is fear.
In the Real Tech World:
You’ll see this mask in:
Engineers who scoff at “soft skills”
Founders who ghost their co-founders rather than have a hard conversation
Tech leads who insist “they don’t do feelings” while quietly eroding their team’s trust
These are people terrified of connection. Not because they’re cold but because connection is unpredictable, unquantifiable, and uncontrollable. That’s unbearable when your identity is built around being right.
The Tell:
In You Can Read Anyone, one of the biggest tells is when someone shows a mismatch between content and delivery.
Mark’s words are sharp. His voice? Flat.
His ideas are disruptive. His energy? Muted.
That disconnect isn’t confidence—it’s suppression.
Takeaway:
If someone in your team always sounds emotionally "clean" no pauses, no hesitations, no visible processing they’re probably not calm.
They’re just highly practised at avoidance.
And if you’re that person?
Start small. Ask someone what they’re feeling, not just what they think.
Then sit in the silence after they answer.
Don’t optimise. Don’t redirect. Just stay.
That’s where real communication begins.
3. Eduardo Saverin — The Pleaser Mask
Loyalty, insecurity, and the slow erosion of self-worth in startup dynamics
If Mark is trying not to feel anything, Eduardo is trying to feel enough. Enough for Mark. Enough for the business. Enough to be kept in the room.
From the beginning of The Social Network, Eduardo is positioned as the sensible one. The reliable one. The “business guy.” He does what’s asked of him. He shows up. He gets blindsided.
But if you watch closely really watch you’ll see the signs long before the betrayal. You’ll see a man constantly adjusting, constantly seeking approval. His emotional baseline isn’t grounded confidence. It’s performance anxiety.
“I was your only friend. You had one friend.”
—Eduardo, when the mask finally breaks.
In You Can Read Anyone, this is classic validation-seeking behaviour—the pleaser mask. It looks like professionalism. It feels like loyalty. But under the surface? It’s fear. Fear of abandonment. Fear of being irrelevant. Fear that competence is the only thing keeping you tethered to the table.
Scene Breakdown:
📽 Key Scene: Eduardo confronts Mark after the shares are diluted.
He doesn’t lead with logic. He leads with betrayal. This isn’t a contract dispute—it’s a heartbreak. And it’s not just about money—it’s about being discarded.
In the Real Tech World:
This mask is rampant. You’ll see it in:
Founders who keep swallowing their discomfort because “now’s not the time to cause friction”
PMs who take on work that isn’t theirs to prove they’re still valuable
Engineers who confuse over-delivery with job security
People in 1:1s who say, “It’s all good”—and then quietly burn out
The pleaser mask is brutal because it makes you complicit in your own marginalisation. You say yes. You make things work. You put your needs last. And when the cut comes, you’re surprised—because you never realised the emotional labour wasn’t being recognised. It was being expected.
The Tell:
In You Can Read Anyone, you spot pleasers by their language and body signals:
Phrases like “I just want to help” or “I’m just trying to do what’s right”
Shrinking posture or constant seeking of eye contact for affirmation
Apologising even when boundaries are being crossed
In Eduardo, it’s the desperate eye contact. The pleading voice. The “I was your only friend.” That’s not a business negotiation—it’s an emotional breakdown in a conference room.
Takeaway:
Not all team players are grounded. Some are just afraid.
If someone is always agreeable, always available, always fine—pause. Ask them what they’re afraid might happen if they weren’t.
And if this is you? Ask yourself what you’re proving, and to whom.
Because the cost of being “the reasonable one” is usually paid in silence—and backdated with resentment.
4. Sean Parker — The Swagger Mask
Charisma, overcompensation, and the performance of genius
Sean Parker enters The Social Network like a storm. He’s charming, fast-talking, seductive. He says the right things with just enough pause to feel dangerous. He knows everyone. He is someone.
But look again. Strip away the confidence and what do you see?
A man who talks too much.
Moves too fast.
Doesn’t really listen.
And underneath the startup mythology? A deep fear of irrelevance.
“A million dollars isn’t cool. You know what’s cool? A billion dollars.”
—Parker’s most quoted line, but also his deepest tell. It’s not about the money. It’s about being seen.
In You Can Read Anyone, this is the overcompensator mask. The person who leads with swagger to hide the need underneath. The more they hype themselves, the more they’re signalling: please believe I matter.
Scene Breakdown:
Key Scene: The nightclub conversation with Mark
On the surface, it’s mentorship. Underneath, it’s seduction by scale. Parker isn’t listening to Mark—he’s performing to him. Every sentence is a sales pitch. Every silence is a setup. It’s not a conversation. It’s a takeover.
In the Real Tech World:
The swagger mask is alive and well in:
Founders with visionary decks but no delivery
Product leads who hijack meetings with TED Talk energy
People who interrupt to add “just one more thing” (that somehow loops back to them)
The guy at the offsite who dominates every breakout session and disappears when it's time to do the actual work
It’s easy to get hypnotised by this mask—especially in environments that reward “big energy” and “bold thinking.” But charisma isn’t competence. And storytelling isn’t strategy.
The Tell:
The overcompensator usually shows their hand through:
Name-dropping
Spotlight-stealing (“Let me tell you what I did at my last company…”)
Zero curiosity about others
A noticeable drop in composure when challenged or ignored
Sean’s arc reveals it perfectly. The party ends. The music stops. He unravels the moment he’s not centre stage.
Takeaway:
The louder someone talks about themselves, the more you should wonder what they’re trying to drown out.
True confidence listens. It leaves space. It doesn’t need to convince.
And if you catch yourself overexplaining, overselling, or dominating conversations—pause. Ask: Who am I trying to impress? And what would happen if I didn’t need to?
Because being seen isn’t the same as being safe.
And confidence that’s real? It doesn’t need to shout.
Absolutely. Now that we’ve unpacked the masks, it’s time to zoom out—to the culture that enables them, rewards them, and calls it “good communication.”
5. What Tech Gets Wrong About Communication
Why emotional blindness looks like professionalism—and what it’s costing us
Tech likes to believe it's a meritocracy. That the best ideas win. That good communication is clear, concise, and clean—preferably in a slide deck or a well-formatted Notion page.
But the truth? Most of what we call "communication problems" in tech are emotional misreads in disguise.
We reward the loudest voice in the room.
We take “just playing devil’s advocate” as intellectual rigour.
We call people “low EQ” and then promote them anyway.
We think being objective means being emotionally absent.
In other words—we don’t listen.
We scan for logic. We optimise for output. We mistake emotional fluency for weakness.
“People are constantly signalling their emotional state. Most of us just aren’t trained to see it.”
—You Can Read Anyone
It’s not that we don’t want to understand each other—it’s that we’ve built cultures where masking is safer than honesty.
So we end up:
Confusing detachment for clarity
Mistaking validation-seeking for loyalty
Rewarding swagger over grounded confidence
And when teams break? When communication collapses? We do retros. We write documents. We schedule more meetings. But we rarely ask the right question:
What was this person protecting?
Because that’s what a mask is for.
Real Talk:
If you’ve ever walked out of a meeting thinking, “That felt off but I can’t explain why,”
If you’ve ever been blindsided by a quiet quit, or a co-founder blow-up, or a team that just stopped trusting each other. This is why.
You didn’t miss the facts.
You missed the signals.
What if we trained for that?
What if tech teams actually learned to read the room, not just present in it?
What if we promoted people who could hold emotional tension, not just resolve it?
What if we stopped calling emotional awareness a “soft skill” and started calling it what it is—critical infrastructure for working with other humans?
Because in a world running on sprints and deadlines, it’s easy to miss that most delays aren’t technical.
They’re relational.
6. How to Build Real Listening Skills in Tech
Because understanding people isn’t magic—it’s methodical
We’ve covered the masks. We’ve watched them play out in The Social Network. We’ve named what tech gets wrong about communication.
Now what?
You don’t need to be a psychologist or a coach. You don’t need a framework, a course, or a certification.
You just need to listen like the mask is part of the message.
Because it is.
Start With One Question:
What are they protecting right now?
This is the entry point.
Behind every interruption, shutdown, over-explanation, or detachment is a need—usually one of these:
To be respected
To be heard
To not be left behind
To stay in control
When you get curious about the emotional why, communication starts to shift. Not always immediately. But enough to notice.
What to Look For (in Meetings, 1:1s, async threads):
Signal | Possible Mask | What It's Protecting |
Constant agreement | Pleaser | Fear of rejection |
Monotone, minimal words | Detacher | Emotional overload |
Interruptions, volume | Swagger | Insecurity, power stress |
Fast logic without emotion | Perfectionist | Fear of being wrong |
Oversharing, off-topic tangents | Spotlight-seeking | Fear of irrelevance |
These aren’t flaws. They’re tells.
And once you start seeing them, conversations stop being confusing—and start being honest.
Practical Tips for Better Communication in Tech:
Listen for the mismatch: When someone’s tone doesn’t match their words, there’s a deeper signal underneath.
Pause before responding: Let tension sit for two seconds longer than you're comfortable with. That’s often when the truth shows up.
Mirror, don’t fix: Instead of advice, try: “It sounds like that really landed hard. Do I have that right?”
Look for energy shifts: A subtle voice drop, an eye-roll, a hesitation—those micro-signals are gold.
Respond to the feeling, not just the sentence:
Them: “It’s fine, we can just go with that.”
You: “You said that like it’s not fine.”Ask this in every tough moment:
“Do you feel heard right now?”
Not agreed with. Not convinced. Heard.
And If You’re the One Wearing the Mask…
Start by noticing when you default to your favourite strategy—pleasing, performing, shutting down.
Then ask yourself: “What am I trying to avoid?”
You don’t have to drop the mask entirely. Just recognise it. Breathe. Choose.
Because communication isn’t just output—it’s signal detection.
And in tech, the people who rise tend to be the ones who can read the room as clearly as they read the code.
Final Thought: Beneath the Metrics, There’s a Pulse
The Social Network isn’t really about Facebook. It’s about people misreading each other until the damage is irreversible.
Don’t let that be your company. Or your team. Or your career.
Because the secret no one tells you is this:
You can read anyone—if you’re willing to stop proving, and start paying attention.
Want More Like This?
I write about the real layers of tech:
Not just code—but communication, emotional blind spots, and the messy human stuff we pretend doesn’t exist.
Visit my site for:
Essays on emotional fluency in engineering
Practical frontend + security insights
Stories about what actually breaks teams (hint: it’s not the codebase)
If you’re building a team, navigating conflict, or just trying to be a better communicator in tech—this is the work that helps.
Snark (softened for tone): Because metrics won’t save you from misreading the room.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Daniel Philip Johnson directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Daniel Philip Johnson
Daniel Philip Johnson
Daniel Philip Johnson | Fullstack Developer | E-commerce & Fintech Specialist | React, Tailwind, TypeScript | Node.js, Golang, Django REST Hi there! I'm Daniel Philip Johnson, a passionate Fullstack Developer with 4 years of experience specializing in e-commerce and recently diving into the fintech space. I thrive on building intuitive and responsive user interfaces using React, Tailwind CSS, SASS/SCSS, and TypeScript, ensuring seamless and engaging user experiences. On the backend, I leverage technologies like Node.js, Golang, and Django REST to develop robust and scalable APIs that power modern web applications. My journey has equipped me with a versatile skill set, allowing me to navigate complex projects from concept to deployment with ease. When I'm not coding, I enjoy nurturing my bonsai collection, sharing my knowledge through tutorials, writing about the latest trends in web development, and exploring new technologies to stay ahead in this ever-evolving field.