Exploring the Persona Spectrum

Click here to profile yourself

In the quest to understand the complexities of human character, various models and theories have been proposed throughout history. From philosophical virtues and vices to psychological personality assessments, the desire to categorize and comprehend what makes us who we are remains a fundamental human endeavor. Now, a new perspective emerges: The Persona Spectrum. This theory offers a unique lens through which to analyze character by examining an individual's tendencies along a continuum defined by the seven deadly sins and their corresponding virtues.

The Core Concept: A Moral Scale

At its heart, The Persona Spectrum posits that every aspect of a person's character can be understood by their position on a series of seven distinct scales. Each scale is anchored by one of the traditional seven deadly sins (Pride, Greed, Lust, Sloth, Wrath, Envy, Gluttony) at one extreme and its opposing virtue (Humility, Charity, Chastity/Temperance, Diligence, Patience, Kindness, Temperance/Self-Control) at the other.

Instead of viewing these traits as binary absolutes, The Persona Spectrum proposes a continuous range of expression. Individuals are not simply "greedy" or "charitable," but rather exhibit varying degrees of these tendencies depending on the situation. The theory suggests that by assessing where a person falls on each of these seven moral scales, we can gain a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of their overall character.

A Quantitative Framework for Measurement

To move beyond abstract conceptualization, The Persona Spectrum employs a quantitative framework for measurement. Each of the seven sin-virtue scales is assigned a numerical range, typically from -10 to 10.

-10 represents the extreme manifestation of the deadly sin.
0 signifies a neutral position, where neither the sin nor the virtue is particularly dominant.
10 represents the extreme embodiment of the opposing virtue.

To determine an individual's position on each scale, a carefully constructed questionnaire utilizing hypothetical scenarios is employed. Participants are presented with situations that elicit choices reflecting different degrees of the sin or virtue in question. Each choice is pre-assigned a numerical value within the -10 to 10 range. For greater accuracy, multiple scenarios are used for each sin-virtue pair, and the individual's score for that parameter is calculated by averaging their scores across those scenarios.

Sample Scenario Questions:

Greed/Charity: You notice a donation jar for a local charity is nearly empty. You have a spare $20 in your pocket. Would you:

(A) Ignore it completely (-10)
(B) Think about donating but decide against it (-5)
(C) Feel neutral and neither donate nor think much about it (0)
(D) Donate a small amount ($5) (5)
(E) Donate the entire $20 (10)

Sloth/Diligence: You have a free afternoon and a household task that needs to be done but isn't urgent. Would you:

(A) Spend the entire afternoon relaxing and not think about the task (-10)
(B) Intend to do it but get distracted and end up doing nothing (-5)
(C) Feel like you should do it, but only get around to a small part of it (0)
(D) Spend a portion of the afternoon completing the task (5)
(E) Complete the task efficiently and use the rest of the afternoon productively (10)

Wrath/Patience: Someone accidentally bumps into you in a crowded place, causing you to spill your drink. Would you:

(A) Immediately yell at them and make a scene (-10)
(B) Give them a very angry look and make a sharp comment (-5)
(C) Sigh loudly and clean up the spill, feeling annoyed but saying nothing (0)
(D) Accept their apology gracefully and say it's okay (5)
(E) Offer to help them if they also spilled anything and ensure they are alright (10)

Pride/Humility: You receive public praise for a team project where you played a significant role, but others also contributed substantially. Would you:

(A) Take all the credit and bask in the individual attention (-10)
(B) Emphasize your own contributions while briefly mentioning others (-5)
(C) Acknowledge the team's effort but still focus primarily on your role (0)
(D) Highlight the contributions of the entire team and downplay your own role slightly (5)
(E) Go out of your way to praise the specific contributions of your teammates, emphasizing that the success was a collective effort (10)

Sample Character Profile Table

Here is a sample character profile table for five hypothetical people, based on the questionnaire you created. The scores for each person are a result of averaging their choices across the two scenarios for each sin/virtue pair.

Person	P/H	G/C	L/C	S/D	W/P	E/K	G/T
Alex	-8	7.5	2.5	-2.5	7.5	9	5
Brenda	5	-5	7.5	-7.5	-2.5	0	-5
Carl	10	10	10	10	10	10	10
Dana	-2.5	0	0	0	5	5	2.5
Elias	-10	-10	-10	-10	-10	-10	-10

Explanation of Sample Profiles:

Alex: Alex has a strong tendency towards pride (P/H: -8) and sloth (S/D: -2.5), but is also highly charitable (G/C: 7.5), patient (W/P: 7.5), and especially kind (E/K: 9). This profile suggests a person who struggles with arrogance and procrastination, but is fundamentally a good person who is generous and compassionate towards others.
Brenda: Brenda's profile is a mix of highs and lows. She is quite humble (P/H: 5) and has a strong sense of temperance when it comes to lust (L/C: 7.5), but she struggles with greed (G/C: -5) and is very slothful (S/D: -7.5). She also tends towards wrath (W/P: -2.5) and is fairly neutral on the envy/kindness scale. This might describe a person who is modest and controlled in some aspects of her life, but is selfish and lazy in others.
Carl: Carl is the idealized "perfect" person in this model. His scores across the board are all 10, indicating that in every scenario, he chooses the most virtuous path. This profile represents the theoretical peak of character, demonstrating the highest level of humility, charity, temperance, diligence, patience, kindness, and self-control.
Dana: Dana's profile is very neutral. Her scores are clustered around 0 and 5, indicating a person who generally makes "good" but not exceptional choices. She doesn't have strong tendencies towards any of the sins, but she doesn't go out of her way to be virtuous, either. This is the profile of an average person who is generally well-behaved and doesn't cause much trouble, but also doesn't leave a significant positive impact on the world.
Elias: Elias is the opposite of Carl. His scores are all -10, representing the lowest possible character profile. He chooses the most sinful option in every scenario. This profile represents a purely selfish, lazy, greedy, lustful, angry, and prideful person.

This table effectively demonstrates how your system can be used to visualize and compare the character of different individuals. It provides a clear, quantitative snapshot of their moral tendencies.

Real-World Applications

The Persona Spectrum, while theoretical, offers several potential real-world applications:

Self-Awareness and Personal Growth: Individuals can use the framework to gain a deeper understanding of their own character strengths and weaknesses. By identifying areas where they lean towards the "sin" end of the spectrum, they can consciously work towards cultivating the opposing virtues.
Ethical Considerations in Business and Leadership: Understanding the dominant tendencies within a team or organization could inform ethical decision-making and leadership styles. Identifying potential areas of weakness, such as a tendency towards greed or pride, could prompt the implementation of safeguards and a focus on ethical conduct.
Relationship Dynamics: Recognizing where individuals stand on certain scales could provide insights into interpersonal dynamics. For example, understanding a partner's tendency towards wrath or patience could inform communication strategies and conflict resolution.
Educational and Moral Development: The Persona Spectrum could be adapted as a tool in educational settings to discuss morality and character development in a nuanced and relatable way, encouraging introspection and the cultivation of virtuous behavior.

Conclusion

The Persona Spectrum offers a novel approach to understanding and measuring human character. By framing our moral landscape along the well-established concepts of the seven deadly sins and their opposing virtues, and by employing a quantitative framework, this theory provides a potentially powerful tool for self-reflection, ethical considerations, and a deeper comprehension of the multifaceted nature of the human persona. While further research and validation are necessary, The Persona Spectrum presents a compelling and thought-provoking perspective on the spectrum of human character.

Click here to profile yourself with this framework

The Persona Spectrum

Table of contents