How to Reduce Rejected Claims in Dermatology by 40%

Charles MurphyCharles Murphy
4 min read

Introduction

In dermatology, rejected claims aren’t just a paperwork nuisance — they’re a direct hit to cash flow and can disrupt patient care. After 20 years in dermatology billing, I’ve seen practices lose tens of thousands annually due to preventable errors.

The good news? With targeted process improvements, most practices can reduce rejected claims by 40% or more within a year. The key is a proactive, prevention-focused approach rather than a reactive, “fix-it-later” mentality.


1. Identify the Root Causes of Rejections

Every practice should start with a denial and rejection analysis. Common causes in dermatology include:

  • Incorrect CPT/ICD-10 pairing (e.g., billing a cosmetic procedure with a medical diagnosis)

  • Modifier misuse (e.g., -59, -51, or -25 not applied correctly)

  • Incomplete documentation

  • Payer-specific rule violations

A 2024 AAPC study found that over 65% of claim rejections are linked to coding or documentation errors (AAPC, 2024).


2. Strengthen Front-End Verification

Most rejected claims can be prevented before the patient even sees the dermatologist. Best practices:

  • Real-time insurance eligibility checks before appointments

  • Verify coverage for high-cost treatments like biologics or laser therapy

  • Confirm patient demographics and plan details at every visit

Small errors like outdated addresses or inactive policies can trigger immediate rejections.


3. Improve Clinical Documentation

Dermatology procedures often require very specific details:

  • Lesion size and exact anatomic location

  • Number of lesions treated

  • Stage/block documentation for Mohs surgery

  • Type of repair (simple, intermediate, complex)

Without precise documentation, coders can’t assign correct CPT codes, and payers can deny the claim for “lack of medical necessity.”


4. Use Accurate CPT and ICD-10 Codes

Regularly update your coding team on:

  • Annual CPT changes (e.g., new codes for emerging therapies)

  • ICD-10 updates for dermatologic diagnoses

  • Payer-specific coverage policies

For example, some carriers require ICD-10 L57.0 (actinic keratosis) for cryotherapy coverage, while others have broader acceptance.


5. Apply Modifiers Correctly

Incorrect modifier use is a top rejection cause. In dermatology:

  • -25: Significant, separately identifiable E/M service on the same day as a procedure

  • -59: Distinct procedural service for unrelated lesions or sites

  • -51: Multiple procedures in the same session

Document the medical necessity for each modifier in the patient’s chart to defend against denials.


6. Train Staff on Payer Rules

Each payer has its own quirks:

  • Lesion count limitations

  • Bundling rules for repairs

  • Requirements for pathology reports

Maintaining a payer policy manual and updating it quarterly can dramatically reduce errors.


7. Implement a Pre-Submission Audit

Before claims leave your system:

  • Run edits for common errors (e.g., missing diagnosis, invalid modifier)

  • Flag high-value or high-risk claims for human review

  • Use billing software with AI-assisted claim scrubbing to catch mistakes early


Track every rejection by:

  • Reason code

  • Payer

  • Procedure type

If you notice a spike in rejections for a specific payer or procedure, address it immediately rather than waiting for monthly reports.


9. Partner with Dermatology Billing Experts

General medical billing services may not catch the specialty-specific nuances that cause rejections in dermatology. At Annexmed’s Dermatology Billing Services, our specialists:

  • Audit claims before submission

  • Stay current on payer dermatology rules

  • Provide denial trend reports

  • Train clinical teams to improve documentation

For one multi-location dermatology client, this approach reduced rejections from 12% to under 5% in six months.


Conclusion

Reducing claim rejections by 40% is achievable when you:

  • Invest in front-end verification

  • Keep coding and documentation sharp

  • Audit before submission

  • Respond quickly to rejection patterns

  • Leverage specialized dermatology billing expertise

The payoff is significant: faster payments, less administrative burden, and a healthier revenue cycle.

FAQs

  • What causes most claim rejections in dermatology?
    Coding errors, missing documentation, and payer rule mismatches.

  • Can front-end verification really help?
    Yes — it prevents most rejections before claim submission.

  • Which modifiers are most often misused?
    Modifiers -25, -59, and -51 in dermatology billing.

  • Do payer rules differ for dermatology?
    Yes — coverage and bundling policies vary widely.

  • Is outsourcing billing effective?
    Specialized dermatology billing teams can cut rejections significantly.

References

  1. AAPC. Dermatology Coding & Billing Guidelines. https://www.aapc.com/

  2. CMS. Medicare Claims Processing Manual. https://www.cms.gov/

  3. MGMA. Improving Practice Revenue Cycle Performance. https://www.mgma.com/

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Charles Murphy directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Charles Murphy
Charles Murphy