RAG, Corrective Approaches & HYDE Explained (In depth)
Shivani PandeyTable of contents
Understanding RAG – Deep Dive with Corrective Approaches & HYDE
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a powerful approach that combines the precision of information retrieval with the creativity and flexibility of LLMs (Large Language Models). It is widely used in AI systems to answer questions accurately, even when the model’s knowledge is limited.
Let’s break it down carefully, with examples.
1. Basic Components of RAG
RAG generally consists of three main steps:
Indexing – storing documents/chunks in a way that they can be efficiently searched.
Retrieval – fetching the most relevant chunks based on a user query.
Generation – using an LLM to generate the final answer based on retrieved chunks.
Key properties of a good RAG system:
Accuracy depends heavily on the underlying LLM and the quality of system prompts.
Speed should be optimized, but cost is also a factor.
GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) principle applies: if the context or query is poor, RAG fails.
2. Challenges in RAG
Even a well-built RAG can fail due to user queries or context issues. Common pitfalls:
Poor context – the documents/chunks may not be properly representative.
Bad user queries – users might make typos, use wrong terms, or miss keywords.
Example:
User query: “Who is the presdent of Amercia?”
Retrieval might fail because of spelling mistakes (
presdent,Amercia).Without correction, the model may not fetch the right chunk.
3. Query Rewriting – Corrective RAG
To improve accuracy, RAG systems often perform query rewriting:
Fix typos.
Add additional context (like synonyms, translations, or alternative names).
Example:
Original query: “presdent Amercia”
Rewritten query: “President of the United States of America”
Effect: The rewritten query retrieves more relevant chunks, which improves generation accuracy, though it slightly increases cost and latency.
4. Vector Embeddings and Retrieval
Each chunk of text is converted into a vector embedding.
User queries are also vectorized.
Retrieval is based on vector similarity rather than exact keyword match.
Example:
Chunk A: “Joe Biden became the president of the USA in 2021.”
Chunk B: “The capital of the United States is Washington D.C.”
User query vector (“President of America”) is closer to Chunk A, so RAG fetches it.
Important: Never rely solely on user queries. Vector embeddings often detect similarity even if the query is vague or poorly written.
5. Cycle of Corrective RAG
Sometimes retrieval produces irrelevant chunks. In such cases, RAG can iterate:
Rewrite query to fix errors and add context.
Re-run retrieval on the vector database.
Remove unrelated chunks, keep relevant/common ones.
Generate answer using the cleaned chunks.
This is known as Corrective RAG.
Example:
User query: “best AI frmaework 2025”
Rewritten queries:
“Best AI framework 2025”
“Top artificial intelligence frameworks 2025”
“Popular AI tools and libraries 2025”
Retrieval hits are combined and cleaned → final generation is much more accurate.
6. HYDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings)
HYDE is a trick to improve RAG retrieval:
Ask a strong LLM to generate a hypothetical answer to the user query.
Embed this answer into a vector.
Compare this vector with the document chunks.
Example:
User query: “Future trends in AI”
LLM generates: “AI is likely to focus on multimodal learning, RAG models, and low-code automation.”
Embedding this answer helps retrieval hit more relevant chunks, even if the user query was vague.
This technique increases hit ratio and ensures that the retrieved context aligns well with the user intent.
7. Practical Implementation Tips
Always split large documents into chunks before embedding.
Maintain a top-N retrieval (like top 5 relevant chunks).
Use hashmaps or indexing structures for faster search.
Combine query rewriting + vector retrieval + corrective RAG for maximum accuracy.
Maintain a common system prompt that integrates instructions from multiple queries.
8. Example Flow – End to End
User query: “best AI framework 2025”
Query rewriting: fixes typo and adds synonyms.
Vector embedding of rewritten queries.
Retrieve top 5 relevant document chunks.
Remove duplicates/irrelevant chunks.
Use an LLM to generate final answer from these chunks.
Optional: HYDE step to embed LLM-generated hypothetical answer and improve retrieval.
9. Benefits
Accuracy improves dramatically.
Speed is optimized by limiting top-N retrieval.
Cost increases slightly, but it’s worth it for correct results.
Works even with poorly written user queries.
✅ Summary
RAG, especially Corrective RAG with query rewriting and HYDE, allows AI systems to:
Handle bad user queries.
Retrieve relevant document chunks reliably.
Generate accurate answers by leveraging both retrieval and LLM generation.
It’s an iterative, robust approach that balances speed, cost, and accuracy, making it a must-have for real-world AI products.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Shivani Pandey directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by