Advanced Rag Patterns And Pipelines

Hrishith SavirHrishith Savir
3 min read

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as one of the most effective ways to bridge the gap between Large Language Models (LLMs). The basic RAG loop—retriever + generator—works however deploying it at scale and ensuring reliable, accurate outputs requires advanced techniques.

1. Scaling RAG Systems for Better Outputs

When datasets grow from thousands to millions of documents, retrieval efficiency becomes critical. Scaling requires:

  • Sharding and Distributed Retrieval – Splitting the vector database across multiple nodes for parallelized search.

  • Index Optimization – Using ANN (Approximate Nearest Neighbor) search libraries (like FAISS, Milvus, Pinecone, Weaviate) tuned for large-scale workloads.

  • Multi-Stage Retrieval – First a fast coarse-grained filter (BM25/keyword search), then fine-grained vector retrieval.

2. Accuracy Enhancement Techniques

Accuracy is often compromised when irrelevant or noisy chunks enter the context. To improve precision:

  • Chunking Strategies – Adaptive chunk sizes (semantic chunking, sliding windows).

  • Contextual Embeddings – Embeddings enriched with metadata (e.g., section headers, author, timestamps) for better contextual matches.

  • Hybrid Search – Combining sparse retrieval (keyword) with dense retrieval (vectors) to capture both semantic and lexical signals.

  • Re-ranking Models – Cross-encoder ranking (e.g., BERT-based) to reorder retrieved passages by relevance before feeding them into the LLM.

3. Speed vs Accuracy Trade-offs

RAG pipelines must balance latency and precision:

  • Shallow vs Deep Retrieval – Fewer documents = faster responses, but higher risk of missing key facts.

  • Smaller vs Larger Models – Using lightweight retrievers for speed, followed by heavier rerankers for accuracy.

  • Caching & Precomputation – Frequently asked queries and embeddings can be cached to reduce response time.

4. Query Translation & Sub-Query Rewriting

Users often ask vague or compound queries.

  • Query Translation – Rewriting user queries into retrieval-friendly forms (e.g., “What’s Tesla’s Q2 revenue?” → “Tesla financial report 2023 Q2 revenue”).

  • Sub-query Decomposition – Splitting complex queries into smaller ones and retrieving results separately, then merging insights.

  • Iterative Refinement – LLM reformulates a query if retrieval confidence is low.

5. LLM as an Evaluator

Instead of passively consuming retrieved documents, the LLM can act as a quality checker:

  • Evaluate whether retrieved chunks actually answer the query.

  • Filter out irrelevant or contradictory context.

  • Score retrieval results for feedback loops (self-reflection and reinforcement).

6. HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings)

HyDE is a powerful approach where the LLM hallucinates a hypothetical answer to the query and then retrieves documents similar to that hypothetical passage.

  • Reduces query-document mismatch.

  • Works well for abstract or underspecified queries.

7. Corrective RAG

Corrective RAG adds a second step:

  • The LLM generates an initial answer.

  • A verifier module checks for factual correctness.

  • If errors are detected, retrieval is repeated with refined queries until a corrected answer is produced.

8. Hybrid Search & Contextual Embeddings

  • Hybrid Search ensures coverage by blending semantic and keyword retrieval.

  • Contextual Embeddings encode more than just text—they integrate structure, metadata, and relationships for richer retrieval.

9. GraphRAG

A recent development, GraphRAG connects documents into a knowledge graph and retrieves based on entity relationships rather than raw text similarity.

  • Example: Instead of just matching text about “Einstein” and “relativity,” GraphRAG retrieves linked nodes in a knowledge graph for deeper reasoning.

  • Useful for multi-hop reasoning, causal queries, and structured domains.

10. Production-Ready Pipelines

Deploying RAG in production requires more than just good retrieval:

  • Monitoring & Logging – Track retrieval accuracy, latency, and hallucination rates.

  • Evaluation Frameworks – Automated benchmarks with LLM-as-judge, ground-truth datasets, and feedback loops.

  • Security & Compliance – Filter PII, enforce role-based retrieval, and ensure auditability.

  • Continuous Index Refresh – Keep vector stores updated with new documents to prevent outdated answers.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Hrishith Savir directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Hrishith Savir
Hrishith Savir