The Three-Door AI Strategy: Why Most CXOs Are Picking the Wrong Door

Article #20 in the #100WorkDays100Articles series

I watched a brilliant CEO destroy his company last month.

Not through scandal or market collapse, but through something far more insidious: paralysis masquerading as prudence.

This guy—let's call him Marcus—ran a mid-sized logistics firm. Smart as hell, Harvard MBA, twenty years of solid growth. When AI started making headlines, Marcus did what every "responsible" leader does: he formed a committee.

Six months of meetings. Vendor demos. Consulting reports thick enough to stop bullets. Meanwhile, his biggest competitor quietly deployed AI route optimization and started underbidding him on every major contract.

"We're being strategic," Marcus told me over coffee, while his company bled market share. "We don't want to make hasty decisions."

That's when I realized most executives are playing a game they don't understand, standing before three doors they can't see clearly.

The Three Doors Every Leader Faces

Marcus's story isn't unique. Every leader I meet is unconsciously choosing between three strategic approaches to AI and digital transformation. Gartner calls them Defend, Extend, and Upend, but the real story is messier than any framework suggests.

Door One: The Safety Dance

This is where Marcus lived. Incremental improvements that feel responsible. Buying productivity software, automating a few tasks, maybe implementing a chatbot for customer service.

It's the business equivalent of wearing a seatbelt while driving off a cliff.

Sure, you'll see some efficiency gains. Time saved here, costs cut there. But while you're patting yourself on the back for "responsible innovation," your competitors are rewriting the rules of your industry.

The cruel joke? Your employees are already doing this stuff anyway. Workers at 90% of companies say they use chatbots, but most of them are hiding it from IT. They're paying for their own AI subscriptions because corporate moves too slowly.

Door Two: The Sweet Spot

This is where things get interesting. Instead of just automating what you already do, you start reimagining how value gets created.

I know a financial advisor who embedded AI into his client analysis process. Not to replace his judgment, but to surface patterns he'd never spot manually. His conversion rates doubled in eight months. His competitors are still using Excel spreadsheets from 2015.

The difference? He asked a better question. Not "How can AI make us more efficient?" but "How can AI help us deliver something our competitors can't?"

This door requires actual courage. You're building custom solutions, integrating data sources, making bets that might not pay off for two years. More than 80 percent of respondents say their organizations aren't seeing a tangible impact on enterprise-level EBIT from their use of gen AI, which tells you how hard this really is.

Door Three: The Moonshot (Where Heroes and Idiots Look Identical)

This is full transformation territory. New business models. Industry disruption. The stuff that either makes you a case study or a cautionary tale.

Satya Nadella bet Microsoft's future on cloud and AI when everyone thought they were done. Radical shift in strategy, billions in investment, complete cultural overhaul. Now they're one of the most valuable companies in the world.

But for every Microsoft, there are dozens of companies that burned through millions chasing AI dreams that never materialized. At least 30% of generative AI projects will be abandoned after proof of concept by the end of 2025, due to poor data quality, inadequate risk controls, escalating costs or unclear business value.

The Real Problem: We're Solving the Wrong Problem

Here's what nobody talks about in those expensive consulting reports: the biggest barrier isn't technology. It's that most leaders are trying to preserve the past instead of creating the future.

Marcus spent six months researching the "best" AI solution for his existing logistics process. He never questioned whether that process should exist at all.

Meanwhile, his competitor was asking: "What if we could predict delays before they happen? What if we could optimize routes in real-time based on weather, traffic, and customer priority?"

Same industry, different universe.

The Shadow Economy Nobody Wants to Admit

While executives debate AI strategy in boardrooms, something fascinating is happening in the cubicles. Rather than waiting for official enterprise gen-AI projects to overcome technical and organizational hurdles, employees are routinely leveraging personal ChatGPT accounts, Claude subscriptions, and other consumer-grade AI tools to automate tasks.

This underground AI adoption is often delivering better results than the million-dollar enterprise initiatives gathering dust in pilot purgatory.

Think about that for a second. Your employees are solving problems faster with twenty-dollar monthly subscriptions than your IT department is with six-figure software deployments.

What does that tell you about your approach to innovation?

The Leadership Blindspot

I've watched C-suite teams tear themselves apart over AI strategy. 42% of C-suite executives report that AI adoption is tearing their company apart. Not because the technology is difficult, but because they fundamentally disagree about what business they're actually in.

The successful companies I've seen don't have better AI strategies. They have better questions:

• What value do we actually create for customers?

• What would our industry look like if we could do the impossible?

• What assumptions about our business model are actually just habits?

The failing companies ask safer questions:

• How can we use AI to do what we already do, but cheaper?

• What's the ROI on this AI investment?

• How do we minimize risk while staying competitive?

See the difference?

The Portfolio Reality

Smart leaders don't pick one door. They build a portfolio.

70% of your resources might go to "defend" activities—keeping the lights on, maintaining competitive parity. Nothing wrong with that. You need to survive today to transform tomorrow.

25% might go to "extend" initiatives—building genuine competitive advantages through thoughtful AI integration.

5% goes to moonshots—the crazy bets that might change everything.

But here's the crucial part: you have to be honest about which bucket each initiative falls into. Too many companies convince themselves their incremental improvements are actually transformational strategies.

The Consciousness Test

At the end of the day, this isn't really about AI or digital transformation. It's about consciousness—your willingness to see reality clearly and act accordingly.

Unconscious leaders defend. They optimize for comfort and call it strategy.

Conscious leaders extend. They optimize for capability and call it progress.

The rarest leaders upend. They optimize for possibility and call it responsibility.

Marcus? Six months after our coffee, his company got acquired. Not the outcome he planned, but maybe the one his approach deserved.

The question isn't which door you'll choose. The question is whether you'll choose at all, or just let circumstances choose for you.

---

Sources:

1. Gartner Research: Generative AI Business Value and Cost Analysis, 2025

2. McKinsey Global Survey: The State of AI in Organizations, 2025

3. Writer: Enterprise AI Adoption Survey, 2025

4. Fortune: The Shadow AI Economy Research, 2025