Common RAG Failure Cases and How to Fix Them

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is one of the most exciting approaches in AI today. It allows large language models (LLMs) to access external knowledge by retrieving relevant documents and then generating answers grounded in that information.

But as powerful as RAG is, it often fails in subtle ways. If you’ve ever worked with a RAG pipeline, you’ve probably seen issues like irrelevant answers, hallucinations, or outdated results. In this article, we’ll explore common failure cases in RAG systems and quick mitigations you can apply to make your system more reliable.

---

1. Poor Recall

What happens?

• The retriever fails to fetch the most relevant documents.

• The generator ends up working with partial or unrelated context.

• Example: You ask “Who is the CEO of OpenAI?” but your retriever only returns documents about “AI startups in general.”

Why it happens?

• Weak embeddings.

• Poor similarity search configuration.

• Too small retrieval pool (e.g., top-3 only).

Quick Fixes

• Use better embedding models (e.g., OpenAI’s text-embedding-3-large or Cohere’s embeddings).

• Retrieve more documents (e.g., top-10 instead of top-3).

• Use hybrid search (combine dense vector + keyword search).

---

2. Bad Chunking

What happens?

• Information is split poorly when creating chunks.

• A single chunk may contain incomplete thoughts or unrelated topics.

• Example: Splitting a legal contract mid-sentence so the retriever fetches half a clause.

Why it happens?

• Arbitrary fixed chunk sizes (e.g., “split every 500 tokens”).

• Ignoring semantic boundaries like paragraphs or sections.

Quick Fixes

• Use semantic chunking (split by headings, paragraphs, or natural language boundaries).

• Apply overlapping chunks (e.g., 200-token overlap) to preserve context across boundaries.

• Experiment with chunk sizes (small chunks improve precision, larger ones improve recall).

---

3. Query Drift

What happens?

• The system retrieves documents that are topically related but not directly answering the user’s intent.

• Example: User asks “Best way to reduce blood sugar naturally?” but retriever pulls docs about “sugar in the food industry.”

Why it happens?

• Embeddings may capture surface-level similarity rather than intent.

• Query not reformulated for retrieval.

Quick Fixes

• Add a query translation layer (use LLM to rephrase query into retrieval-friendly form).

• Use sub-query decomposition for complex questions.

• Add reranking step (use cross-encoder to score candidate documents by relevance).

---

4. Outdated Indexes

What happens?

• You keep retrieving stale or irrelevant results because the index is not updated.

• Example: An index still shows “Sam Altman was ousted from OpenAI” months after leadership changed.

Why it happens?

• Vector databases not refreshed with new data.

• No mechanism for handling temporal updates.

Quick Fixes

• Set up regular re-indexing pipelines.

• Use incremental updates rather than full re-ingestion.

• Consider time-aware retrievers that prioritize recent documents.

---

5. Hallucinations from Weak Context

What happens?

• The generator fabricates answers not present in retrieved docs.

• Example: User asks about a product spec, and the model “guesses” instead of relying on retrieved context.

Why it happens?

• Retrieved context is too thin or incomplete.

• Generator not instructed to stay grounded.

Quick Fixes

• Add grounding prompts (e.g., “Only answer from the provided context. If unsure, say ‘Not found.’”).

• Use LLM-as-a-judge to verify if generated answers align with retrieved docs.

• Add retrieval confidence scoring and fallback to “I don’t know” if confidence is low.

---

Wrapping Up

RAG systems are powerful, but they’re not magic. They break in predictable ways: poor recall, bad chunking, query drift, outdated indexes, and hallucinations. Fortunately, each failure case has practical mitigations—better embeddings, semantic chunking, query rewriting, re-indexing, and grounding strategies.

If you want your RAG pipeline to work reliably in production, you need to think beyond “retriever + generator” and engineer feedback loops, evaluation layers, and update pipelines.

---

💡 Pro Tip: Always test your RAG system with real user queries, not just synthetic examples. That’s where these failure cases will show up the most!