Bridging the Gap: A Real-World Journey Migrating MongoDB to AWS

If you’ve ever carried the weight of a mission-critical database migration, you know the knot in your stomach.

That moment when leadership drops the line:

We need to move our aging on-prem MongoDB setup to the cloud… and by the way, downtime is not an option.

That was my reality.

How do you move terabytes of live production data with tens of thousands of daily users — all while guaranteeing zero data loss and near-zero disruption?

The truth is, migrating a database isn’t just a technical exercise. It’s a balancing act. On one side: business continuity, downtime tolerance, and fallback safety nets. On the other: performance, operational simplicity, and long-term cost efficiency.

In our case, we had to move a production MongoDB cluster from on-premises to AWS. On paper, it sounds simple: lift-and-shift the data, flip traffic over, and call it done. But as soon as we dug deeper, the real story unfolded — one shaped by constraints, trade-offs, and the need for automation.

And that’s where this blog series comes in.

In this blog series, I’ll take you through the journey step by step. Specifically, in this first post I’ll share:

• Solution evaluation — the migration options on the table and how we measured them.

• Decision making — why we chose the final solution and the benefits it unlocked.

• Architecture at a glance — the key components and how they fit together.

• Execution blueprint — the migration runbook, checklist, and validation scripts we used to keep things on track.

Think of this post as a reference you can adapt to your own migration journey. Future articles will dive deep into the implementation details of each component. But for now, let’s start with the most important foundation: understanding the requirements.

---

Primary Goals

• Near-zero downtime migration — target ≤ 15 minutes of interruption during final cutover.

• Fallback support (The Most critical) — for a few days after the migration, we must be able to switch back to the on-prem cluster if needed. Any writes made in the cloud must also flow back to on-premises during that fallback window.

• Strict consistency for user session data — the application is deployed active-active across 2 regions, which means per-user and session token consistency is non-negotiable.

• Smooth operational model — the team prefers minimal overhead; Reduce administrative burden and ongoing maintenance compared to current on-prem setup.

---

Key Constraints

• The application already runs active-active in two AWS regions (us-east-1 and us-east-2).

• The migration solution must allow on-prem to resume as primary at any point before final cut, with cloud writes synced back.

• Operational simplicity matters — the database team is small; “heroic babysitting” of the DB during migration or ongoing operations is not acceptable.

---

Options Evaluated

In my opinion..

For me, the key driver was clear from the start:

How do I bridge the gap between the source and the target so that both remain in sync until I’m confident enough to cut over?

With that guiding principle, I narrowed down the options to two main paths:

---

Option 1 — Self-Managed MongoDB on EC2 (Single Replica Set Across On-Prem + Cloud)

This was the first option I explored, because on paper it looks like the most straightforward way to migrate with minimal downtime. The idea is simple: extend your existing on-prem replica set by adding new MongoDB nodes running on EC2 in AWS. Once those new secondaries sync up, you promote one to primary in the cloud and cut over applications.

At first glance, this seems elegant — a single replica set, no exotic tools, and fallback comes almost “for free” since the on-prem nodes are still part of the same cluster. But once you dig deeper, the operational realities quickly surface.

Migration Characteristics — Downtime & Fallback

• Downtime: With this model, downtime can be very low. You add EC2 nodes as secondaries, let them perform initial sync from the on-prem primary, and then promote a cloud node to primary during cutover. Applications can keep writing during sync, so disruption is minimal — but elections and topology changes need to be carefully choreographed.

• Fallback: The fallback story is indeed strong here. Because the on-prem nodes are still part of the same cluster, you can reconfigure elections to prefer the on-prem primary if needed. But there’s a catch: if the on-prem nodes are offline while the cloud is taking writes, you may need to catch them up later using oplog replay. It’s doable, but operationally fragile.

Data Consistency Across Regions

• A single replica set means a single primary at all times — which guarantees strict consistency for writes. That’s great for session tokens and per-user data.

• However, if the primary is in one AWS region, writes from the other region pay a latency tax. Reads from remote secondaries can be stale unless carefully configured with read preferences or session guarantees. And if you want true low-latency writes in both regions, this approach falls short — you’d be forced into sharding or complex global cluster topologies.

Migration Tools & Reliability

• The tools are all standard MongoDB: rs.add() to join EC2 nodes, initial sync to copy data, or mongodump/mongorestore for smaller datasets.

• Reliability depends on having a big enough oplog to cover the entire sync window and stable network bandwidth for terabytes of replication traffic.

Potential Challenges & Mitigations

• Network latency & partitions → can cause election churn or even split-brain. You need careful voting member placement (odd number, spread across zones).

• Operational overhead → you manage everything: OS patching, backups, upgrades, monitoring. That’s a lot of human toil unless you heavily automate with Ansible/Terraform/SSM.

• WAN bandwidth → if the dataset is large, initial sync may take days. Throttling or seeding via snapshots is often required.

• Version drift → cloud nodes must exactly match on-prem versions to avoid surprises.

Complexity & Timeline

This option demands a serious engineering investment. You’re building and running MongoDB as a distributed system across WAN links. For most teams, that’s a 4–12 week project even before factoring in testing, automation, and runbooks.

Operational Considerations

OS, MongoDB, backups, upgrades, monitoring, and patching,failover drills, cross-region debugging — all on you. Investigating replication lag or diagnosing elections across a WAN is not for the faint of heart.

Scalability & Growth

Yes, it scales — but you’re on the hook for managing sharding if writes outgrow a single primary. Cross-region scaling adds more operational pain.

Security

You get full control (TLS, SCRAM auth, KMS for disk encryption) — but also full responsibility. Miss one setting, and you’re exposed.

Cost Factors

At first glance, EC2 looks cheaper because you’re not paying management fees. But once you factor in licensing, engineering time, operational overhead, and the cost of mistakes at 2 a.m., the total cost of ownership often comes out higher.

---

Verdict on Option 1

• Pros:

  • Easy fallback — on-prem and cloud in the same replica set.

  • Strict single-primary semantics, which keeps data consistency simple.

  • Maximum control over deployment and tuning.

• Cons:

  • Heavy operational burden: monitoring, backups, patching, networking.

  • WAN fragility: elections, replication lag, and split-brain risk.

  • Latency tradeoffs across regions.

  • Higher TCO once people/time are factored in.

In short: this option works if you have a very strong operations team and want full control. But if your goal is to minimize maintenance and focus on business value, it’s not ideal

---

Option 2 — MongoDB Atlas (Managed) + Live Migration + CDC for Fallback

With this approach, you create a MongoDB Atlas cluster in AWS (single-region, multi-region, or Global Cluster depending on geo-write needs).

• Initial sync is handled by Atlas Live Migration (or mongomirror in edge cases), which keeps source and destination in sync until cutover.

• Fallback coverage is achieved via a CDC pipeline: Atlas Change Streams → Kafka/MSK → Kafka Connect/Debezium (or custom applier) → on-prem MongoDB. This ensures that if the cloud starts taking writes before you’re confident, on-prem stays in sync.

• Alternatively we kept a backup approach in our tool kit for CDC pipeline - Dual-Write Application Pattern — Modify the application (or introduce a write-side proxy/sidecar) to synchronously or preferrabelly asynchronously write all mutations to both the cloud (Atlas) and on-prem MongoDB. Reads continue to be served according to session affinity rules.

Migration Characteristics — Downtime & Fallback

• Downtime: Atlas Live Migration supports continuous sync while on-prem is still active. The only downtime is during cutover — pausing writes, applying final oplog entries, and repointing applications. With planning, this is minutes, not hours.

• Fallback: Since Atlas won’t allow mixing on-prem nodes into its cluster, you need a CDC pipeline to stream cloud writes back to on-prem during the stabilization window. This keeps fallback viable. Dual-writes at the app layer are another option, but they add complexity and inconsistency risk.

Data Consistency Across Regions

• Atlas supports Global Clusters and Global Writes for low-latency geo-distributed apps. These rely on sharded clusters (M30+) and careful shard key design. ( We chose Global Cluster)

• For strict consistency (e.g., login/session data), a single primary with session affinity is often simpler. Atlas lets you choose the right trade-off with flexible writeConcern and readPreference settings.

Migration Tools & Reliability

• Atlas Live Migration Service is the go-to for production migrations — reliable, continuous, and purpose-built.

• mongomirror covers edge cases or legacy topologies.

• AWS DMS can work in document/table mode, but is less flexible.

• Key requirement: source must be accessible and version-compatible.

Potential Challenges & Mitigations

• On-prem not part of Atlas → solve with CDC (Change Streams → Kafka/MSK → applier).

• Version mismatches → confirm compatibility between source and Atlas target.

• Connectivity/security → use PrivateLink, VPC peering, or VPN/Direct Connect with TLS and IP allowlists.

• CDC reliability → use resume tokens, idempotent writes, and built-in ordering guarantees to avoid replays or out-of-order issues.

Complexity & Timeline

Provisioning Atlas is quick. Live Migration simplifies most of the heavy lifting. The main engineering effort lies in the CDC pipeline. For most teams, the timeline runs 2–6 weeks depending on dataset size, testing, and fallback complexity. If global writes are required, add time for sharding design.

Operational Considerations

Atlas handles the bulk of operations: backups, upgrades, patching, monitoring. Your responsibility is primarily the CDC system — ensuring Kafka/MSK and the applier are healthy, monitoring replication lag, and validating cutover/fallback runbooks.

Scalability & Growth

Atlas is built for scale — from replica sets to multi-region global clusters. The CDC pipeline must be sized for throughput (partitioned topics, scalable consumers). For global writes, shard key choice is critical.

Security

Atlas provides enterprise-grade controls out of the box: Private Endpoints, VPC peering, TLS, encryption at rest, customer KMS integration. Kafka/MSK and the CDC applier must also be secured (IAM, mTLS, network isolation).

Cost Factors

Atlas brings higher direct DB costs (compute + storage + managed fees) compared to EC2, plus the Kafka/MSK overhead for CDC. However, operational cost is far lower long-term since you’re not babysitting servers or elections at 2 a.m. Migration tooling itself is typically free; you pay for the Atlas cluster, CDC infra, and data transfer (including egress/PrivateLink).

---

Verdict on Option 2

• Pros:

  • Fully managed MongoDB with built-in scaling, monitoring, and automation.

  • Native tooling (Live Migration, mongomirror) purpose-built for MongoDB migrations.

  • Change Streams provide a reliable way to stream new writes from Atlas → on-prem until final cut.

  • Dramatically reduced operational burden; the team focuses on application, not DB babysitting.

• Cons:

  • Slightly more complex fallback sync design (requires CDC pipelines, not native replica set membership).

  • Higher direct service costs compared to EC2, but offset by lower operational burden.

Option 2 is often the best fit when downtime must be minimal, fallback is required, and long-term operations should be simplified. Atlas Live Migration reduces risk and CDC provides a safety net during stabilization. The trade-off is engineering effort for the CDC pipeline and careful design if global writes are needed.

---

Decision and Justification

After evaluating both options, we chose Option 2 — MongoDB Atlas with CDC Pipeline

Why? Because although Option 1 offered the comfort of a single replica set, in practice it creates more risk than it removes. Managing cross-region replica sets is operationally fragile: elections can misfire, replication lag becomes unpredictable, and the team would spend nights firefighting instead of moving forward.

Atlas, on the other hand, offloads those headaches. It provides:

• A reliable platform tuned for AWS with built-in HA.

• Easy migration tooling.

• A clean path to keep on-prem in sync via Change Streams, fulfilling the fallback requirement.

• Lower long-term TCO once we account for people cost and operational risk.

---

Architecture at a glance

At a high level, here’s what we designed:

1. MongoDB Atlas Cluster (Cloud Target):

• Multi-AZ deployment in AWS for HA.

• Option to extend into multi-region for global writes (future-proofing).

2. Atlas Live Migration (Initial Sync):

• Powered by mongomirror under the hood.

• Pulls data from on-prem MongoDB into Atlas continuously until cutover.

3. Change Streams + CDC Pipeline (Bidirectional Stabilization):

• On-prem → Atlas: Already handled by live migration.

• Atlas → On-prem: Change Streams capture cloud writes → pushed into Apache Kafka (MSK) → replayed into on-prem cluster.

• Components:

  • Amazon MSK (Kafka): durable event bus, buffering, replay support.

  • On-prem Applier: idempotent consumer(s) that apply changes into on-prem MongoDB; maintains checkpoints and DLQ.

  • Checkpoint store: durable store (DynamoDB / S3 / RDS) to track MongoDB resume tokens and consumer offsets.

4. Cutover & Validation:

• Freeze writes briefly, final sync, and flip application endpoints to Atlas.

• Validation checks to ensure data consistency.

---

Migration Execution Plan

We didn’t just “wing it.” A solid migration needs runbooks, checklists, and rehearsals. Here’s how we structured ours:

Pre-Migration Preparation

• ✅ Assess dataset size & indexes.

• ✅ Validate Atlas cluster sizing.

• ✅ Test network connectivity (VPC peering, firewall rules).

• ✅ Build rollback plan.

Execution Steps

1. Spin up Atlas cluster in target AWS region.

2. Run Atlas Live Migration to sync on-prem data.

3. Enable Change Streams CDC pipeline for cloud → on-prem sync.

4. Run shadow testing (point a subset of traffic to Atlas for validation).

5. Plan cutover window (low traffic period).

Cutover Checklist

• ✅ Freeze app writes.

• ✅ Trigger final sync.

• ✅ Validate row counts + critical collections.

• ✅ Update application configs to point to Atlas connection string.

• ✅ Rollback trigger ready (DNS + scripts).

Validation Steps

• ✅ Application smoke tests (auth, API, writes).

• ✅ Collection-level consistency checks.

• ✅ Performance benchmarking vs on-prem.

• ✅ Monitor Atlas metrics post cutover.

---

The Key Takeaway

This migration taught me one big lesson: Cloud migrations are 20% tooling and 80% process.

• The right tools (mongomirror, Change Streams, Kafka) made it possible.

• But the planning (checklists, runbooks, rehearsals) made it successful.

In the end, we achieved what felt impossible at first:

• Zero downtime cutover.

• Seamless data consistency.

• A modern, managed database platform (Atlas) that we no longer had to babysit.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This was the “big picture” story. Over the next posts, I’ll get deeply technical into each component:

• Post 2: Spinning up Atlas like a pro (Console, AWS CLI, Terraform) + running the Live Migration end-to-end.

• Post 3: Building the CDC pipeline with Change Streams → Kafka → on-prem applier (with automation scripts).

If you’ve ever faced the anxiety of “how do I move my production database to the cloud without blowing it up?” — stay tuned.

---

Thank you for taking the time to read my post! 🙌 If you found it insightful, I’d truly appreciate a like and share to help others benefit as well.